Conscience and Religious Freedom Trump Public Health

Ethics and Medics 46 (3):3-4 (2021)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Conscience rights and public health often come into conflict. Both Catholic social teaching and the natural moral law give primacy to conscience and religious freedom. Those who put public health on a par with conscience and religious freedom, or who imply an equivalence among them, as if they were comparable elements of public policy, are misguided, however well intentioned. Ironically, the common good that is the foundation of the right to public health is harmed by violating conscience and religious freedom. The principle should be clear: all of society, not solely the state, should promote the common good through public health and safety measures insofar as doing so does not violate the dignity of the human person, especially in matters of conscience and religious freedom.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,628

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Legitimate guarantees of freedom of conscience.Liudmyla O. Fylypovych - 2000 - Ukrainian Religious Studies 15:96-97.
Assessing Trump’s Legacy for Catholics.Ryan J. Barilleaux - 2021 - Catholic Social Science Review 26:153-168.
Conscience Rights under the New HHS Rule.Marie T. Hilliard - 2019 - Ethics and Medics 44 (7):2-4.
The Law of Conscience.Anthony R. Lusvardi - 2012 - Logos: A Journal of Catholic Thought and Culture 15 (2):13-41.
Alternative Burdens on Freedom of Conscience.Adam J. Kolber - 2010 - San Diego Law Review 47:919-934.

Analytics

Added to PP
2021-08-30

Downloads
6 (#1,454,899)

6 months
5 (#625,697)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references