Einstein on religion and science

Synthesis Philosophica 21 (2):267-283 (2006)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The main issue of this paper is the question what Einstein actually meant from the philosophical and/or theological point of view in his famous phrase God does not play dice. What is the ‘underlying’ concept of necessity in this phrase, and first of all: which God here does not play dice – theistic, deistic, pantheistic? Some other passages from Einstein’s informal writings and public speeches suggest that he was very close to pantheism, following Spinoza, whom he admired and appreciated mostly among philosophers. However, Spinoza’s pantheism implies determinism which was presumably not the main point of Einstein’s protest against ‘dicing God’ in quantum physics… So, is Einstein’s God nevertheless closer to Newton’s Pantocrator as to Spinoza’s Deus sive natura? Maybe yes, but only in case if the ‘Universal Ruler’ does not punish, neither reward his creatures, ourselves, tiny human beings in the mighty and incredibly ‘well-tuned’ cosmos. The enigma of the famous phrase remains

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,867

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-10-31

Downloads
46 (#336,233)

6 months
3 (#1,206,449)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Marko Uršič
University of Ljubljana

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Causal determinism.Carl Hoefer - 2008 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.

Add more references