Both urban and rural interests have a stake in the “farm” bill: A report on roundtable discussions of the 1990 agricultural legislation

Agriculture and Human Values 7 (3-4):102-106 (1990)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The increasing role of non-farm groups in the agricultural policy process creates an opportunity for extension educators in public policy. Both farmers and non-farmers need information from an impartial source and both would benefit from exchanging views. Four Roundtable discussions of the 1990 agricultural legislation in Illinois brought together citizens from farm and urban backgrounds to exchange ideas. This paper summarizes the concerns and consensus that emerged in discussions of commodity programs, international trade, the environment, and food programs. Participants' reaction to this program effort are also reported. Roundtable meetings met a desire for greater commmunication, particularly between farmers and environmentalists

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,829

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Comparative differences in ontario farmers' environmental attitudes.Glen C. Filson - 1993 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 6 (2):165-184.
Ethological farm programs and the “market” for animal welfare.Stefan Mann - 2005 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 18 (4):369-382.
The legitimacy of the agricultural extension service.Ulrich Nitsch - 1988 - Agriculture and Human Values 5 (4):50-56.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-12-01

Downloads
14 (#989,410)

6 months
1 (#1,469,946)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references