Continuous Reproductive Surveillance

Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 51 (3):570-574 (2023)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The Dobbs opinion emphasizes that the state’s interest in the fetus extends to “all stages of development.” This essay briefly explores whether state legislators, agencies, and courts could use the “all stages of development” language to expand reproductive surveillance by using novel developments in consumer health technologies to augment those efforts.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,672

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Reproductive justice: Non‐interference or non‐domination?Himani Bhakuni - 2023 - Developing World Bioethics 23 (2):93-98.
The limitations of liberal reproductive autonomy.J. Y. Lee - 2022 - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 25 (3):523-529.
Reproductive Justice as Reparative Justice.Desiree Valentine - 2023 - Social Philosophy Today 39:101-118.

Analytics

Added to PP
2023-12-14

Downloads
6 (#1,456,201)

6 months
6 (#509,130)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Leah Fowler
Ivy Tech State College

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references