Understanding Freedom in the Creatives of the Revolution

Epistemological studies in Philosophy, Social and Political Sciences 6 (1):118-124 (2023)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The article considers the meaning of freedom in the context of the revolution, its interpretation by social philosophers of the second half of the 20th century (H.Arendt, H.Marcuse, E.Fromm, Y.Habermas and other scientists). It is emphasized that the struggle for freedom can be one of the factors of the beginning of revolutionary events, at the same time, revolutionary events can cause a new round of the struggle for freedom. Investigating the genesis of the concept of “revolution”, it is noted that in the political aspect, the origins of the revolution lie in the plane of “civil disorder” of the ancient polis. At the initial stage, there was an understanding of the revolution as a restoration, an attempt to find the absolute in the past, and a fear of founding something completely new. Based on the comparative characteristics of the French and American revolutions, it is noted that initially they were perceived by their participants primarily as an uprising against tyranny and oppression, as a return to the old just order. The revolutionary goals of the American and French revolutions were identical – freedom from domination. But unlike the French, the American revolution focused not on liberation, but on the establishment of a new republic, a new type of government. Thus, the French revolution was the revolution of the liberators, and the American revolution was the revolution of the founders. A key difference between the French and American revolutions was the assessment of freedom as the main goal of the revolution: the French revolution rose against a limited monarchy, the American revolution against an absolute one. The American Revolution was aimed at the formation of new institutions, a system of checks and balances, and the division of power into separate branches of government. The French Revolution almost immediately lost the public political space, personal “political freedom” was replaced by the “unified will of the people”, and the destruction of the old system did not lead to the proper formation of the new one. Despite the obvious success of the American revolution, it was the French revolution with all its problems and pitfalls that became the prototype of almost all revolutions of the 19th and 20th centuries.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,435

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Freedom within Understanding.A. S. Kleinherenbrink - 2014 - International Philosophical Quarterly 54 (4):429-441.
Bergson’s Conception Of Freedom.Adam Piekarski - 2010 - Studia Philosophica Wratislaviensia 5 (1):97-116.
Freedom of the heart.Bennett W. Helm - 1996 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 77 (2):71--87.
Формування інформаційного суспільства в україні: Виклик чи потреба часу?Ірина Козачок - 2015 - Гуманітарний Вісник Запорізької Державної Інженерної Академії 62:140-146.
Феномен промислових революцій.R. V. Klymenko - 2017 - Вісник Харківського Національного Університету Імені В. Н. Каразіна. Серія «Філософія. Філософські Перипетії» 56:47-55.
Kant and Revolution.Rafał Wonicki - 2022 - Diametros 19 (75):17-36.
Rahnerian Freedom.Mark Joseph T. Calano - 2008 - Proceedings of the Xxii World Congress of Philosophy 20:51-68.
Radical Liberalism and Social Freedom.Gary Chartier - 2019 - In Roger Bissell, Chris Matthew Sciabarra & Ed Younkins (eds.), The Dialectics of Liberty: Exploring the Context of Human Freedom. Roman & Littlefield. pp. 255-74.

Analytics

Added to PP
2023-10-06

Downloads
6 (#1,446,534)

6 months
4 (#787,091)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references