Scientific ResolutionThe Great Devonian Controversy: The Shaping of Scientific Knowledge among Gentlemanly SpecialistsMartin J. S. Rudwick

Isis 77 (3):508-511 (1986)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1086/354211

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,532

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Martin J.S. Rudwick. The Great Devonian Controversy: The Shaping of Scientific Knowledge Among Gentlemanly Specialists. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press, 1985. Pp. xxxiii + 494. ISBN 0-226-73101-4. £36.75. [REVIEW]J. Morrell - 1987 - British Journal for the History of Science 20 (1):88-89.
Reviews. [REVIEW][author unknown] - 1987 - Zygon 22 (2):249-268.
Sir Karl Popper.Kelley Ross - manuscript
Collective Scientific Knowledge.Melinda Fagan - 2012 - Philosophy Compass 7 (12):821-831.
Sustaining a Controversy: The Non-classical Ion Debate.William Goodwin - 2013 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 64 (4):787-816.
Constructing Audiences in Scientific Controversy.Jason A. Delborne - 2011 - Social Epistemology 25 (1):67-95.
The Public Dimension Of Scientific Controversies.Jeanine Czubaroff - 1997 - Argumentation 11 (1):51-74.
Epistemic dependence and collective scientific knowledge.Jeroen de Ridder - 2014 - Synthese 191 (1):1-17.
Knowledge as Kennenlernen : Subjectivity, Pluralism, and Intimacy.Mimi Marinucci - 2010 - Social Epistemology 24 (4):301-311.
Toward a pragmatic account of scientific knowledge.Jeffrey Alan Barrett - unknown
In What Sense Is Scientific Knowledge Collective Knowledge?Hyundeuk Cheon - 2014 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 44 (4):407-423.
Some Problems in the Logic of Scientific Knowledge.P. V. Tavanets & V. S. Shvyrev - 1962 - Russian Studies in Philosophy 1 (3):33-41.
The Dimensions of Scientific Controversy: The Biometric—Mendelian Debate.Robert Olby - 1989 - British Journal for the History of Science 22 (3):299-320.
A theory of scientific study.Robert W. P. Luk - 2017 - Foundations of Science 22 (1):11-38.
Objective Knowledge and the Knowing Subject: The Popper-Kuhn Debate.Lloyd Martin Eby - 1988 - Dissertation, Fordham University

Analytics

Added to PP
2016-06-30

Downloads
6 (#1,453,583)

6 months
1 (#1,470,413)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references