Introduction: Social, Political, and Cultural Theory since the Sixties: The Demise of Classical Marxism and Liberalism, the New Reality of the Welfare State, and the Loss of Epistemic Innocence

In Gerard Delanty & Stephen Turner (eds.), Routledge International Handbook of Contemporary Social and Political Theory. London: Routledge (2011)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The publication of John Rawls’ A Theory of Justice in 1971 coincided with a complex set of changes in the political situation of the west, the role of intellectuals, the state of the social sciences and humanities, and in the development of the welfare state itself. These changes provided the conditions for the creation of a body of thought quite different from the one the sixties had produced, and a significant change from the discipline-dominated thinking of the period after the Second World War. The immediately relevant events included the effective demise of Parsons’ systems theory, the waning of the passions of 1968, and an enrollment crisis in universities’ humanities and social science departments as economic fear drove students into professional programs, creating a sharp downturn in demand for faculty. The optimism that had characterized disciplines in these fields during the 1960s quickly faded. The idea that sociology was soon to become a “science,” the source of the positivism dispute of the sixties, faded along with it. Logical Positivism as a coherent movement collapsed under the weight of the problems of the theory-observation distinction. At the same time Political Theory, which had been taught largely as an historical study – a history of error, as Leo Strauss described the standard textbook of the time, George Sabine’s A History of Political Theory, or as a continuation of the mood of Kulturpessimismus, as in the writings of Sabine’s critic, Leo Strauss – revived, partly in response to the stimulus from the success of Rawls, partly in response to new ideas about participatory democracy rooted in the experience of the sixties. Social theory also changed: the role that Parsons had played as a focus of theoretical discussion was replaced; the work of Ju˝rgen Habermas, particularly his Theory of Communicative Action, reassessed and re-appropriated the classical theoretical tradition in social theory to replace Parsons’ synthetic account, and this work coincided with a systematic reconsideration of the classic social theorists, especially Weber. An additional source of new thinking came from the “dependent” periphery, as thinkers such as Ernesto Laclau and Chantal Mouffe, which emancipated Socialist theory from received dogmas about class struggle and recognized the centrality of other antagonisms and the need for open democracy.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,853

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Welfare Pluralism: Welfare Provision Transformation from State to Multi-sectors.Hua-min Peng & Ye-Qing Huang - 2006 - Nankai University (Philosophy and Social Sciences) 6:40-48.
Marxism and Politics.James Miller - 1978 - Télos 1978 (36):183-191.
Laclau: a critical reader.Simon Critchley & Oliver Marchart (eds.) - 2004 - New York: Routledge.
Classical Social Theory.Ian Craib - 1997 - Oxford University Press.
Democratic Liberalism and Social Union. [REVIEW]David Duquette - 1991 - The Owl of Minerva 23 (1):100-104.
Hobbes and Rawls on Political Power.Joseph Grcic - 2007 - Etica E Politica 9 (2):371-392.
Rawls's A theory of justice: an introduction.Jon Mandle - 2009 - New York: Cambridge University Press.

Analytics

Added to PP
2019-07-14

Downloads
9 (#1,252,744)

6 months
3 (#973,855)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references