Doffing the mask: Why manuscript reviewers ought to be identifiable [Book Review]

Journal of Academic Ethics 1 (1):41-48 (2003)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,423

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
43 (#362,182)

6 months
3 (#1,002,413)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

The Role of Philosophy in Academic Ethics.J. Angelo Corlett - 2014 - Journal of Academic Ethics 12 (1):1-14.
The problem of humiliation in peer review.Debra R. Comer & Michael Schwartz - 2014 - Ethics and Education 9 (2):141-156.
On doffing the mask.D. G. Brown - 2007 - Journal of Academic Ethics 5 (2-4):217-219.
The Ethics of Academic Journal Editing.J. Angelo Corlett - 2008 - Journal of Academic Ethics 6 (3):205-209.
Corruption and representations of scholarly output.Robert Liebler - 2008 - Journal of Academic Ethics 6 (3):259-269.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references