- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Withholding and Withdrawing Life-Sustaining Treatment and the Relevance of the Killing Versus Letting Die Distinction
American Journal of Bioethics 19 (3):34-36 (2019)
Abstract
This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)Other Versions
No versions found
My notes
Similar books and articles
Drawing a Line Between Killing and Letting Die: The Law, and Law Reform, on Medically Assisted Dying.Lawrence O. Gostin - 1993 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 21 (1):94-101.
Is the Principle of Proportionality Sufficient to Guide Physicians' Decisions Regarding Withholding/Withdrawing Life-Sustaining Treatment After Suicide Attempts?Stanley A. Terman - 2013 - American Journal of Bioethics 13 (3):22 - 24.
Euthanasia, withholding life-prolonging treatment, and moral differences between killing and letting die.R. Gillon - 1988 - Journal of Medical Ethics 14 (3):115-117.
Letting and making death happen, withholding and withdrawing life-support: Morally irrelevant distinctions. [REVIEW]Claude Gratton - 1990 - Journal of Medical Humanities 11 (2):75-80.
Korean Experience of Withholding and Withdrawing of Life-Sustaining Therapy in Intensive Care Units.Jae Young Moon & Younsuck Koh - 2012 - Asian Bioethics Review 4 (1):42-47.
Who Plays What Role in Decisions about Withholding and Withdrawing Life-Sustaining Treatment?JoAnn Bell Reckling - 1997 - Journal of Clinical Ethics 8 (1):39-45.
Withholding and Withdrawing Life-Sustaining Treatment: Ethically Equivalent?Lars Øystein Ursin - 2019 - American Journal of Bioethics 19 (3):10-20.
Analytics
Added to PP
2019-03-22
Downloads
65 (#343,328)
6 months
11 (#272,803)
2019-03-22
Downloads
65 (#343,328)
6 months
11 (#272,803)
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
How do people use ‘killing’, ‘letting die’ and related bioethical concepts? Contrasting descriptive and normative hypotheses.David Rodríguez-Arias, Blanca Rodríguez López, Anibal Monasterio-Astobiza & Ivar R. Hannikainen - 2020 - Bioethics 34 (5):509-518.
Withholding Versus Withdrawing Treatment: Why Medical Guidelines Should Omit “Theoretical Equivalence”.Lars Øystein Ursin - 2019 - American Journal of Bioethics 19 (6):W5-W9.
The Equivalence Thesis: Why Timers Do Not Successfully Resuscitate the Acts/Omissions and Withdrawal/Withholding Debate.Dominic Wilkinson, Ella Butcherine & Julian Savulescu - 2019 - American Journal of Bioethics 19 (4):W6-W9.
References found in this work
The Ethics of Killing.Jeff Mcmahan - 2002 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 71 (2):477-490.
Withdrawal Aversion and the Equivalence Test.Julian Savulescu, Ella Butcherine & Dominic Wilkinson - 2019 - American Journal of Bioethics 19 (3):21-28.
A Costly Separation Between Withdrawing and Withholding Treatment in Intensive Care.Dominic Wilkinson & Julian Savulescu - 2012 - Bioethics 28 (3):127-137.
Abortion, infanticide and allowing babies to die, 40 years on.Julian Savulescu - 2013 - Journal of Medical Ethics 39 (5):257-259.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-99fc7d78b-qtxsx uwo