Paradoxes of Human Nature

Etica E Politica 9 (1):181-186 (2007)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Our psychobiological nature is characterized paradoxically by our limitedly having and not having free will — our having this will and being subject to causes understood scientifically. Both characteristics are necessary for an intelligible ethics, politics, and political science. In particular, political science as a science must admit of our behavior being partially caused and of political rights and responsibilities in virtue of our limited free will. Admitting of either only this will or only the determinism is a central error of modern totalitarian ideology

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,897

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

On human nature.Arthur Schopenhauer - 1897 - London,: Allen & Unwin. Edited by T. Bailey Saunders.
Spinoza’s Model of Human Nature.Andrew Youpa - 2009 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 48 (1):pp. 61-76.
Human Nature in a Post-essentialist World.Grant Ramsey - 2013 - Philosophy of Science 80 (5):983-993.
Iotism and Human Nature in Machiavelli.Hillay Zmora - 2004 - History of Political Thought 25 (3):424-445.

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-02-02

Downloads
0

6 months
0

Historical graph of downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Robert Trundle
University of Colorado, Boulder (PhD)

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references