- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
On the Subject of Impairment
In Mairian Corker Tom Shakespeare (ed.), Disability/Postmodernity: Embodying Disability Theory. Bloomsbury Publishing. pp. 32 (2002)
Abstract
This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)Author's Profile
Links
PhilArchive
External links
(no proxy)
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Through your library
- Sign in / register and customize your OpenURL resolver
- Configure custom resolver
My notes
Similar books and articles
Foucault, Power, and the Subject of Impairment.Shelley Tremain - 1997 - In Lennard J. Davis (ed.), The Disability Studies Reader. Psychology Press. pp. 185.
On the Government of Disability: Foucault, Power, and the Subject of Impairment.Shelley Tremain - 1997 - In Lennard J. Davis (ed.), The Disability Studies Reader. Psychology Press.
Changing the subject: postmodernity and people with 'learning difficulties'.Dan Goodley & Mark Rapley - 2002 - In Mairian Corker Tom Shakespeare (ed.), Disability/Postmodernity: Embodying Disability Theory. Bloomsbury Publishing. pp. 127--142.
Madness, distress and postmodernity: Putting the record straight.Anne Wilson & Peter Beresford - 2002 - In Mairian Corker Tom Shakespeare (ed.), Disability/Postmodernity: Embodying Disability Theory. Bloomsbury Publishing. pp. 143--158.
Bodies together: Touch, ethics and disability.Margrit Shildrick & Janet Price - 2002 - In Mairian Corker Tom Shakespeare (ed.), Disability/Postmodernity: Embodying Disability Theory. Bloomsbury Publishing. pp. 63--75.
Naming and narrating disability in Japan.James Valentine - 2002 - In Mairian Corker Tom Shakespeare (ed.), Disability/Postmodernity: Embodying Disability Theory. Bloomsbury Publishing. pp. 213--227.
Bodies together: Touch, ethics and disability.Janet Price andMargrit Shildrick - 2002 - In Mairian Corker Tom Shakespeare (ed.), Disability/Postmodernity: Embodying Disability Theory. Bloomsbury Publishing.
Mapping the terrain.Mairiam Corker & Tom Shakespeare - 2002 - In Mairian Corker Tom Shakespeare (ed.), Disability/Postmodernity: Embodying Disability Theory. Bloomsbury Publishing. pp. 7.
Cultural maps: Which way to disability?Tanya Titchkosky - 2002 - In Mairian Corker Tom Shakespeare (ed.), Disability/Postmodernity: Embodying Disability Theory. Bloomsbury Publishing. pp. 145--160.
Disability in the Indian context: Post-colonial perspectives.Anita Ghai - 2002 - In Mairian Corker Tom Shakespeare (ed.), Disability/Postmodernity: Embodying Disability Theory. Bloomsbury Publishing. pp. 88--100.
Analytics
Added to PP
2011-10-27
Downloads
166 (#117,525)
6 months
19 (#180,987)
2011-10-27
Downloads
166 (#117,525)
6 months
19 (#180,987)
Historical graph of downloads
Author's Profile
Citations of this work
Disability studies, conceptual engineering, and conceptual activism.Elizabeth Amber Cantalamessa - 2021 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 64 (1-2):46-75.
Foucault, governmentality, and critical disability theory: An introduction.Shelley Tremain - 2005 - In _Foucault and the Government of Disability_. University of Michigan Press. pp. 1--24.
Disability, Impairment, and Marginalised Functioning.Katharine Jenkins & Aness Kim Webster - 2021 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 99 (4):730-747.
This is What a Historicist and Relativist Feminist Philosophy of Disability Looks Like.Shelley Tremain - 2015 - Foucault Studies (19):7.
Disabled – therefore, Unhealthy?Sean Aas - 2016 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 19 (5):1259-1274.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-6686886f5-2nz2h uwo