What's the Harm? Why the Mainstreaming of Complementary and Alternative Medicine is an Ethical Problem.

Ethics in Biology, Engineering and Medicine 4 (4):333-344 (2013)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This paper argues that it is morally irresponsible for modern medical providers or health care institutions to support and advocate the integration of CAM practices (i.e. homeopathy, acupuncture, energy healing, etc.) with conventional modern medicine. The results of such practices are not reliable beyond that of placebo. As a corollary, it is argued that prescribing placebos perceived to stand outside the norm of modern medicine is morally inappropriate. Even when such treatments do no direct physical harm, they create unnecessary barriers to patients' informed understanding of their health.

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Complementary and Alternative Medicine: Foundations, Ethics, and Law.Robert M. Sade - 2003 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 31 (2):183-190.
Complementary and Alternative Medicine: Foundations, Ethics, and Law.Robert M. Sade - 2003 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 31 (2):183-190.
The Ethics of New Age Medicine.Tadeusz Pacholczyk - 2017 - Ethics and Medics 42 (8):1-2.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-12-12

Downloads
1,065 (#12,883)

6 months
87 (#60,223)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Lawrence Torcello
Rochester Institute of Technology

Citations of this work

Medical Pluralism as a Matter of Justice.Kathryn Lynn Muyskens - 2024 - Journal of Medical Humanities 45 (1):95-111.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Add more references