Edwin Southern, DNA blotting, and microarray technology: A case study of the shifting role of patents in academic molecular biology

Genomics, Society and Policy 2 (2):1-12 (2006)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Edwin Southern developed a blotting technique for DNA in 1973, thereby creating a staple of molecular biology laboratory procedures still used after several decades. It became a seminal technology for studying the structure of DNA. The story of the creation and dissemination of this technology, which was not patented and was freely distributed throughout the scientific community, stands as a case study in open science. The Southern blot was developed at a time when attitudes about commercial intrusion into health research were beginning to change and the practical value of molecular genetics was becoming apparent to industry. Interest from industry in fundamental molecular biological techniques meant that scientists began to think about commercial uses of their work even in otherwise "basic" research. The unpatented Southern blot is contrasted with later patented technologies, particularly microarray methods, which were created in the same environment by many of the same people, but which followed significant changes to UK policies encouraging commercialization of academic research and a norm shift friendlier to such commercialization within academic molecular biology. Professor Southern's personal experience illuminates how the technologies evolved, and his views provide insight into how scientists' attitudes about commercialization have changed.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,642

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Interactions among Theory, Experiment, and Technology in Molecular Biology.Kenneth F. Schaffner - 1994 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1994:192 - 205.
Adriano buzzati-traverso and the foundation of the international laboratory of genetics and biophysics in naples (1962-1969). [REVIEW]M. Capocci & G. Corbellini - 2002 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 33 (3):489-513.
The Case for Basic Biological Research.Isobel Ronai & Paul Edmund Griffiths - 2019 - Trends in Molecular Medicine 25 (2).
Reconstructing life. Molecular biology in postwar Britain.S. Chadarevian - 2002 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 33 (3):431-448.

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-02-04

Downloads
8 (#517,646)

6 months
8 (#1,326,708)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references