Educational relational networks: indigenous and feminist worlding. A response to Troy Richardson

Ethics and Education 18 (1):23-27 (2023)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This paper is a response to Troy Richardson’s Terence McLaughlin’s Lecture. In it, I discuss how Richardson provides a unique reading of relationality, drawing together technology studies, Indigenous Education and feminist philosophy of education. Seeking to walk with key ideas he develops, this response also points to a possible limitation in seeing Noddings ethic of care as part of a feminist relational ontology that can help inform new ways of understanding ‘machine learning’. In particular, I introduce the notion of worlding as a way of complementing Richardson’s reading of relationality – a notion that has profound implications for pedagogical practice.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,592

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Ubuntu relational love: decolonizing Black masculinities.Devi Dee Mucina - 2019 - Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada: University of Manitoba Press.
Whither Bioethics Now? The Promise of Relational Theory.Susan Sherwin & Katie Stockdale - 2017 - International Journal of Feminist Approaches to Bioethics 10 (1):7-29.
Relational being: beyond self and community.Kenneth J. Gergen - 2009 - New York: Oxford University Press.
Open‐Mindedness in a “Post‐Truth” Era.Troy Richardson - 2019 - Educational Theory 69 (4):439-453.
Autonomy, Perfectionism and the Justification of Education.Johannes Drerup - 2014 - Studies in Philosophy and Education 34 (1):63-87.
Relational Complexes.Joop Leo - 2013 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 42 (2):357-390.

Analytics

Added to PP
2023-03-14

Downloads
6 (#1,454,046)

6 months
4 (#779,041)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations