- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Defending The Open Future: Replies to MacFarlane, Green, Wasserman, and Bigg & Miller
Analytic Philosophy (forthcoming)
Abstract
These are my materials (a short precis, and replies to John MacFarlane, Mitchell Green, Ryan Wasserman, and Anthony Bigg and Kristie Miller) for a symposium on my book, _The Open Future: Why Future Contingents are All False_ (OUP, 2021) in *Analytic Philosophy*. [The contribution from MacFarlane is available on his website, those from Wasserman and Green are on their Academia profiles, and the contribution from Bigg and Miller is on Miller's PhilPapers profile.]Author's Profile
My notes
Similar books and articles
On The Open Future: Replies to Rhoda and Rubio.Patrick Todd - forthcoming - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion.
The Open Future: Why Future Contingents are All False, by Patrick Todd. [REVIEW]Giacomo Andreoletti - 2022 - Ratio 36 (1):82-85.
Future contingency, future indeterminacy, and grounding: comments on Todd: Book symposium: Patrick Todd, The Open Future: Why Future Contingents are All False. New York: Oxford University Press, 2021. 224 pp. $80.00. [REVIEW]Alan R. Rhoda - 2024 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 95 (1):103-109.
The Open Future: Why Future Contingents are All False, by Patrick Todd. [REVIEW]Aldo Frigerio - 2023 - Manuscrito 46 (1):220-230.
Patrick Todd, The Open Future: Why Future Contingents are All False. [REVIEW]Elijah Hess - 2022 - European Journal for Philosophy of Religion 14 (4):294-297.
The Open Future: Why Future Contingents Are All False, by Patrick Todd. [REVIEW]Donald Wayne Viney - 2023 - Process Studies 52 (2):285-291.
Critical Notice: The Open Future: Why Future Contingents Are All False, by Patrick Todd. [REVIEW]Stephan Torre - 2024 - Philosophical Quarterly 74 (3):1036-1043.
Book review Patrick Todd open future: Why future contingents are all false. [REVIEW]Alessio Santelli - 2022 - European Journal of Analytic Philosophy 18 (2):1-11.
Patrick Todd. The Open Future: Why Future Contingents are All False. [REVIEW]Alan R. Rhoda - 2023 - Journal of Analytic Theology 11:738-742.
Can truth relativism account for the indeterminacy of future contingents?Corine Besson & Anandi Hattiangadi - 2022 - Synthese 200 (3):1-23.
Analytics
Added to PP
2023-10-30
Downloads
254 (#82,665)
6 months
124 (#39,179)
2023-10-30
Downloads
254 (#82,665)
6 months
124 (#39,179)
Historical graph of downloads
Author's Profile
References found in this work
Assessment Sensitivity: Relative Truth and its Applications.John MacFarlane - 2014 - Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Précis of Objects and Persons.Trenton Merricks - 2003 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 67 (3):700-703.
Critical Notice: The Modal Future: A Theory of Future-Directed Thought and Talk.Patrick Todd - 2024 - Philosophical Quarterly 74 (3):1026-1035.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-6686886f5-xdvnm uwo