Patrick Todd, The Open Future: Why Future Contingents are All False [Book Review]

European Journal for Philosophy of Religion 14 (4):294-297 (2022)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

-

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.24204/ejpr.2022.3983

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,127

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

The open future, bivalence and assertion.Corine Besson & Anandi Hattiangadi - 2014 - Philosophical Studies 167 (2):251-271.
Future Contingents are all False! On Behalf of a Russellian Open Future.Patrick Todd - 2016 - Mind 125 (499):775-798.
Against the Russellian open future.Anders J. Schoubye & Brian Rabern - 2017 - Mind 126 (504): 1217–1237.
The fictional future.Emily Caddick Bourne & C. Bourne - unknown
The Open Future Square of Opposition: A Defense.Elijah Hess - 2017 - Sophia 56 (4):573-587.
Knowing Future Contingents.Ezio Di Nucci - 2012 - Logos and Episteme 3 (1):43-50.
Open future and modal anti-realism.Daniel Kodaj - 2014 - Philosophical Studies 168 (2):1-22.
Aristotelian indeterminacy and the open future.Robert Williams - manuscript
In Defence of Ockhamism.Sven Rosenkranz - 2012 - Philosophia 40 (3):617-631.
A Note on Assertion, Relativism and Future Contingents.J. Adam Carter - 2012 - Logos and Episteme 3 (1):139-144.

Analytics

Added to PP
2023-01-17

Downloads
33 (#500,650)

6 months
14 (#200,872)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Elijah Hess
St. Louis Community College-Wildwood

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references