One principle and three fallacies of disability studies

Journal of Medical Ethics 28 (3):203-203 (2002)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

A question between John Harris and I is the degree to which lessons may be learned, and insights gained, from a life distinguished by physical differences. He argues it as the “aborting Beethoven fallacy”, I insist on the evidence that what we learn from physical differences may be critical and life enhancing

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,532

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

One principle and three fallacies of disability studies.J. Harris - 2001 - Journal of Medical Ethics 27 (6):383-387.
Disability, minority, and difference.Elizabeth Barnes - 2009 - Journal of Applied Philosophy 26 (4):337-355.
One principle and a fourth fallacy of disability studies.J. Harris - 2002 - Journal of Medical Ethics 28 (3):204-204.
Three fallacies.Jonathan E. Adler - 2000 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 (5):665-666.
Philosophical and Ethical Issues in Disability.Jeffrey Blustein - 2012 - Journal of Moral Philosophy 9 (4):573-587.
CanThere Be a Disability Studies Theory of "End-of-Life Autonomy"?Harold Braswell - 2011 - The Disability Studies Quarterly 31 (4):online.
Willing, Wanting, Waiting by Richard Holton. [REVIEW]Nir Eisikovits - 2012 - Journal of Moral Philosophy 9 (4):603-606.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-08-24

Downloads
27 (#584,888)

6 months
7 (#419,552)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?