Journal of Applied Philosophy 38 (5):760-773 (2021)

Authors
Dick Timmer
Dortmund University
Abstract
In this article, I assess the prospects for the limitarian thesis that someone has too much wealth if they exceed a specific wealth threshold. Limitarianism claims that there are good political and/or ethical reasons to prevent people from having such ‘surplus wealth’, for example, because it has no moral value for the holder or because allowing people to have surplus wealth has less moral value than redistributing it. Drawing on recent literature on distributive justice, I defend two types of limitarian principles of justice. First, limitarian midlevel principles draw on the limitarian thesis to specify normative commitments for guiding institutional design and individual actions. Second, the limitarian presumption draws on that thesis to specify what a just allocation of wealth requires under epistemic constraints. Such a presumption says that without substantive reasons to the contrary, we should regard a distribution as unjust if some people’s wealth exceeds the limitarian threshold. Furthermore, I will argue that we must reject a possible but implausible interpretation of limitarianism as an ideal distributive pattern. Yet both as a midlevel principle and as a presumption, limitarianism can play an important role in theorizing about justice in the real world.
Keywords Limitarianism  Distributive justice  Wealth  Political equality  Basic needs
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1111/japp.12502
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

 PhilArchive page | Other versions
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Egalitarianism Defended.Larry S. Temkin - 2003 - Ethics 113 (4):764-782.
The Presumption of Equality.Cynthia Stark - 2018 - Law. Ethics and Philosophy 6:7-27.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

The Limits of Limitarianism.Robert Huseby - 2022 - Wiley: Journal of Political Philosophy 30 (2):230-248.
Thresholds and Limits in Theories of Distributive Justice (Thesis Summary).Dick Timmer - 2022 - Erasmus Journal for Philosophy and Economics 15 (1).

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Autonomy-Based Reasons for Limitarianism.Danielle Zwarthoed - 2018 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 21 (5):1181-1204.
The Feasibility of the Application of Presumption in Belief-Related Issues.Ahmad Mortazi - 2019 - Journal of Philosophical Theological Research 20 (78):190-204.
Preface: The Presumption of Innocence.Liz Campbell, James Chalmers & Antony Duff - 2014 - Criminal Law and Philosophy 8 (2):283-284.
Professor Flew and the Stratonician Presumption.P. J. Mcgrath - 1969 - Philosophical Studies (Dublin) 18:150-159.
Rethinking the Presumption of Atheism.Keith Burgess-Jackson - 2018 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 84 (1):93-111.
Distribution and Ignorance.Juha Räikkä - 2019 - Synthese 198 (3):2641-2657.
The Presumption of Equality.Stefan Gosepath - 2008 - Proceedings of the Xxii World Congress of Philosophy 50:205-211.
The Limit of Charity and Agreement.Chuang Ye - 2008 - Frontiers of Philosophy in China 3 (1):99-122.
Rethinking the Presumption of Innocence.Victor Tadros - 2006 - Criminal Law and Philosophy 1 (2):193-213.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2021-03-02

Total views
74 ( #154,134 of 2,498,570 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
43 ( #19,868 of 2,498,570 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes