Defending the Democratic Argument for Limitarianism: A Reply to Volacu and Dumitru

Philosophia 47 (4):1331-1339 (2019)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In this paper, I argue that limitarian policies are a good means to further political equality. Limitarianism, which is a view coined and defended by Robeyns, is a partial view in distributive justice which claims that under non-ideal circumstances it is morally impermissible to be rich. In a recent paper, Volacu and Dumitru level two arguments against Robeyns’ Democratic Argument for limitarianism. The Democratic Argument states that limitarianism is called for given the undermining influence current inequalities in income and wealth have for the value of democracy and political equality. Volacu and Dumitru’s Incentive Objection holds that limitarianism places an excessive and inefficient burden on the rich in ensuring political equality. The Efficacy Objection holds that even if limitarianism limits excessive wealth it still fails to ensure the preservation of political equality. In this paper, I will argue that both of these objections fail, but on separate grounds. I argue that the Incentive objection fails because one could appeal to limitarian policies that are different from the ones discussed by Volacu and Dumitru and which escape the problem of reduced productivity. I argue against the Efficacy Objection that limitarian policies are a partial but highly valuable step towards establishing political equality, and that they can and should complement or be complemented by other strategies.

Other Versions

No versions found

Similar books and articles

Corporate Limitarianism.Karl Meyer - 2021 - Penn Journal of Philosophy, Politics and Economics 16 (1).
The expressive injustice of being rich.David V. Axelsen & Lasse Nielsen - forthcoming - Politics, Philosophy and Economics.
Why Limitarianism Fails on its Own Premises – an Egalitarian Critique.Lena Halldenius - 2022 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 25 (5):777-791.
Autonomy-Based Reasons for Limitarianism.Danielle Zwarthoed - 2018 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 21 (5):1181-1204.

Analytics

Added to PP
2018-10-25

Downloads
407 (#60,982)

6 months
94 (#60,889)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Dick Timmer
Dortmund University

Citations of this work

Why Limitarianism?Ingrid Robeyns - 2022 - Journal of Political Philosophy 30 (2):249-270.
Limitarianism: Pattern, Principle, or Presumption?Dick Timmer - 2021 - Journal of Applied Philosophy 38 (5):760-773.
The Limits of Limitarianism.Robert Huseby - 2022 - Journal of Political Philosophy 30 (2):230-248.

View all 10 citations / Add more citations