Philosophia 47 (4):1331-1339 (2019)

Dick Timmer
Dortmund University
In this paper, I argue that limitarian policies are a good means to further political equality. Limitarianism, which is a view coined and defended by Robeyns, is a partial view in distributive justice which claims that under non-ideal circumstances it is morally impermissible to be rich. In a recent paper, Volacu and Dumitru level two arguments against Robeyns’ Democratic Argument for limitarianism. The Democratic Argument states that limitarianism is called for given the undermining influence current inequalities in income and wealth have for the value of democracy and political equality. Volacu and Dumitru’s Incentive Objection holds that limitarianism places an excessive and inefficient burden on the rich in ensuring political equality. The Efficacy Objection holds that even if limitarianism limits excessive wealth it still fails to ensure the preservation of political equality. In this paper, I will argue that both of these objections fail, but on separate grounds. I argue that the Incentive objection fails because one could appeal to limitarian policies that are different from the ones discussed by Volacu and Dumitru and which escape the problem of reduced productivity. I argue against the Efficacy Objection that limitarian policies are a partial but highly valuable step towards establishing political equality, and that they can and should complement or be complemented by other strategies.
Keywords Limitarianism  Political Philosophy  Political Equality  Taxation
Categories No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
Reprint years 2019
DOI 10.1007/s11406-018-0030-6
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

 PhilArchive page | Other versions
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Self-Ownership, Freedom, and Equality.G. A. Cohen - 1995 - Cambridge University Press.
Self-Ownership, Freedom and Equality.Eric Mack - 1995 - Philosophy 72 (281):478-482.
The Ethical Limitations of the Market.Elizabeth Anderson - 1990 - Economics and Philosophy 6 (2):179.

View all 15 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Why Limitarianism?Ingrid Robeyns - 2022 - Wiley: Journal of Political Philosophy 30 (2):249-270.
Limitarianism: Pattern, Principle, or Presumption?Dick Timmer - 2021 - Journal of Applied Philosophy 38 (5):760-773.
The Limits of Limitarianism.Robert Huseby - 2022 - Wiley: Journal of Political Philosophy 30 (2):230-248.
Limits to Wealth in the History of Western Philosophy.Matthias Kramm & Ingrid Robeyns - 2020 - European Journal of Philosophy 28 (4):954-969.
Thresholds and Limits in Theories of Distributive Justice (Thesis Summary).Dick Timmer - 2022 - Erasmus Journal for Philosophy and Economics 15 (1).

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Democracy and Equality.Steven Wall - 2007 - Philosophical Quarterly 57 (228):416–438.
Democratic Justice: The Priority of Politics and the Ideal of Citizenship.Valentina Gentile - 2017 - Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 20 (2):211-221.
Political Equality in a Democracy.Yossi Dahan - 1989 - Dissertation, Columbia University
The Political Egalitarian’s Dilemma.Fabienne Peter - 2007 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 10 (4):373-387.
Democratic Equality and Political Authority.Daniel Viehoff - 2014 - Philosophy and Public Affairs 42 (4):337-375.
How to Attack the Luck Argument. E. Coffman - 2010 - Philosophical Explorations 13 (2):157-166.
How (Not) to Attack the Luck Argument.E. J. Coffman - 2010 - Philosophical Explorations 13 (2):157-166.


Added to PP index

Total views
81 ( #141,843 of 2,499,868 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
14 ( #55,986 of 2,499,868 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes