- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Introduction: Buddhist Argumentation
Argumentation 22 (1):1-14 (2008)
Abstract
This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)Links
PhilArchive
External links
(no proxy)
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Through your library
- Sign in / register and customize your OpenURL resolver
- Configure custom resolver
My notes
Similar books and articles
Norms and Practices of Public Argumentation.Jan Albert van Laar & Frank Zenker - 2024 - Argumentation 38 (1):1-5.
Introduction to the Special Issue on Fallacies.Hans V. Hansen - 2023 - Argumentation 37 (2):159-165.
A general bibliography: Argumentation and child development.[author unknown] - 1987 - Argumentation 1 (2):201-207.
Argumentation in Complex Communication: Managing Disagreement in a Polylogue Cambridge University Press, 263 pp. [REVIEW]Marcin Lewiński, Mark Aakhus & Karen Tracy - 2023 - Argumentation 37 (3):493-495.
Bermejo-Luque, Lilian. Giving Reasons. A Linguistic-Pragmatic Approach to Argumentation Theory. [REVIEW]C. Andone - 2012 - Argumentation 26 (2):291-296.
Ruth Amossy: In defense of polemics, Springer, Argumentation Library, Volume 42, 2021. [REVIEW]Jean-Claude Guerrini - 2022 - Argumentation 36 (3):447-451.
Plausible deniability and evasion of burden of proof.Douglas Walton - 1996 - Argumentation 10 (1):47-58.
The platonization of the Gauls or French history according to Ramus.Philippe Desan - 1991 - Argumentation 5 (4):375-386.
Analytics
Added to PP
2013-11-21
Downloads
13 (#288,494)
6 months
41 (#375,834)
2013-11-21
Downloads
13 (#288,494)
6 months
41 (#375,834)
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
Argumentation and learning.Baruch B. Schwarz - 2009 - In Nathalie Muller Mirza & Anne Nelly Perret-Clermont (eds.), Argumentation and education. New York: Springer. pp. 91--126.
Ways of Doing Cross-Cultural Philosophy.Koji Tanaka - 2016 - In Makeham John (ed.), Learning from the Other: Australian and Chinese Perspectives on Philosophy. Australian Academy of the Humanities. pp. 59-65.
Who is a Proper Opponent? The Tibetan Buddhist Concept of phyi rgol yang dag.Hiroshi Nemoto - 2013 - Journal of Indian Philosophy 41 (2):151-165.
Animist Intersubjectivity as Argumentation: Western Shoshone and Southern Paiute Arguments Against a Nuclear Waste Site at Yucca Mountain. [REVIEW]Danielle Endres - 2013 - Argumentation 27 (2):183-200.
Twenty-two ways to lose a debate: A Gricean look at the nyāyasūtra 's points of defeat. [REVIEW]Alberto Todeschini - 2010 - Journal of Indian Philosophy 38 (1):49-74.
References found in this work
Empty words: Buddhist philosophy and cross-cultural interpretation.Jay L. Garfield - 2002 - New York: Oxford University Press.
Recognizing Reality: Dharmakīrti's Philosophy and Its Tibetan Interpretations.Georges B. J. Dreyfus & Georges Dreyfus Cortés - 1997 - SUNY Press.
Epistemology, logic, and grammar in Indian philosophical analysis.Bimal Krishna Matilal - 1971 - The Hague,: Mouton. Edited by Jonardon Ganeri.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-68866f4b87-lc8fp uwo