The Nature of Substance

Cogito 2 (2):17-19 (1988)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Modern physics has cast doubt on Newton's idea of particles with definite properties. Do we have to go back to Aristotle for a new understanding of the ultimate nature of substance? If we ask, `what is the nature of substance?', we might be told that this substance is salt, that one is copper, or that the atomic nucleus is a mixture of protons and neutrons. But what are all these substances? What do they have in common which makes them substances? We don't seem to think that such things as colours, numbers, or shapes are by themselves `substantial enough' to be substances in their own right. We therefore change our question to `what is it to be a substance?', or to `what is the ultimate nature of the simplest substances?'.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-08-13

Downloads
235 (#53,130)

6 months
11 (#82,179)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Ian J. Thompson
Livermore Laboratory

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references