Geach on Deriving Categorical 'Oughts'

Philosophy 55 (211):101 - 104 (1980)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1017/s0031819100063786

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,783

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Constitutivism and the Inescapability of Agency.Luca Ferrero - 2009 - Oxford Studies in Metaethics 4:303-333.
Imperatives, oughts, and moral oughts.Hector-Neri Castaneda - 1966 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 44 (3):277 – 300.
On deriving categorical imperatives from the concept of action.Laszlo Versenyi - 1976 - Ethics 86 (4):265-273.
The foundations of corporate responsibility.J. B. Wilbur - 1982 - Journal of Business Ethics 1 (2):145 - 155.
Ifs and Oughts.Niko Kolodny & John MacFarlane - 2010 - Journal of Philosophy 107 (3):115-143.
Categorical and agent-neutral reasons in Kantian justifications of morality.Vaughn E. Huckfeldt - 2007 - Philosophia 35 (1):23-41.
Oughts and ends.Stephen Finlay - 2008 - Philosophical Studies 143 (3):315 - 340.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-08-10

Downloads
9 (#1,251,255)

6 months
1 (#1,467,486)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Thomas Hurka
University of Toronto, St. George Campus

Citations of this work

Peter Geach's Ethics.Katharina Nieswandt - 2020 - In Hähnel Martin (ed.), Aristotelian Naturalism: A Research Companion. Springer. pp. 183-193.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references