Ethics in the Innovation Process: Some Unaddressed Issues for Pragmatists

Contemporary Pragmatism 20 (1-2):53-76 (2023)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

There are now dozens of proposals for integrating ethics into the early planning and assessment of technological innovation. This paper tracks some of Larry Hickman’s contributions to these trends. While Hickman’s suggestions could be incorporated into virtually many of the new proposals for integrating ethics into technological research, development and dissemination, barriers remain. In this paper, I will explores some reasons why the field remains fragmented, emphasizing weaknesses in the pragmatist approach. First, I acknowledge the significance of obvious explanations: the technical community’s unfamiliarity with ethical inquiry and the lack of both administrative and financial commitment to ethics-oriented research. There is, in short, an epistemic gap between the message that innovators are prepared to hear and the sophisticated response that Hickman’s pragmatism offers. This gap may be a practical limitation to philosophical pragmatism in many of its manifestations.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,435

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

What is innovation?Sergio F. Martínez - 2019 - Theoria: Revista de Teoría, Historia y Fundamentos de la Ciencia 34 (3):343-355.
What Is Innovation?Vincent Blok - 2021 - Techné: Research in Philosophy and Technology 25 (1):72-96.
Philosophical reflections on the concept of Innovation.Vincent Blok - 2021 - In Handbook on Alternative Theories of Innovation. Northampton, Verenigd Koninkrijk: pp. 354-367.

Analytics

Added to PP
2023-04-19

Downloads
9 (#1,236,107)

6 months
6 (#510,035)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Paul B. Thompson
Michigan State University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Conceptualizing Epistemic Oppression.Kristie Dotson - 2014 - Social Epistemology 28 (2):115-138.
John Dewey’s Logic of Science.Matthew J. Brown - 2012 - Hopos: The Journal of the International Society for the History of Philosophy of Science 2 (2):258-306.
New Social Movements.Jürgen Habermas - 1981 - Telos: Critical Theory of the Contemporary 49:33.

Add more references