Mill’s Defense of Capital Punishment

Criminal Justice Ethics 36 (2):141-151 (2017)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

John Stuart Mill strongly supports capital punishment for aggravated murder. He rejects various arguments against capital punishment, including the claim that it is incompatible with respect for hu...

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,098

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Ján Kollár’s Thoughts on Capital Punishment.Vasil Gluchman - 2021 - Studies in Christian Ethics 34 (2):171-189.
Desert, Justice and Capital Punishment.Patrick Lenta & Douglas Farland - 2008 - Criminal Law and Philosophy 2 (3):273-290.
Sham arguments and capital punishment.Keith Burgess-Jackson - 1997 - Criminal Justice Ethics 16 (2):3-6.
Sham arguments and capital punishment.Burgess-Jackson Keith - 1997 - Criminal Justice Ethics 16 (2):3-6.
The Utilitarianism.George Sher (ed.) - 2001 - Hackett Publishing Company.
Capital Punishment: Its Lost Appeal?Christopher P. Ferbrache - 2013 - Essays in the Philosophy of Humanism 21 (2):75-89.
Is Capital Punishment Murder?Luke Maring - 2018 - Notre Dame Journal of Law, Ethics and Public Policy 32 (2):587-601.
Physicians, medical ethics, and capital punishment.Timothy F. Murphy - 2005 - Journal of Clinical Ethics 16 (2):160.

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-10-25

Downloads
83 (#207,689)

6 months
22 (#128,904)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Crime, Guilt, and Punishment: A Philosophical Introduction.C. L. Ten - 1991 - Philosophical Review 100 (1):133-136.
The Life of John Stuart Mill. [REVIEW]Dwight N. Lindley - 1955 - Philosophical Review 64 (4):660-663.

Add more references