On the Domain of Applicability of General Relativity

Foundations of Physics 28 (2):307-331 (1998)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

We consider the domain of applicability of general relativity (GR), as a classical theory of gravity, by considering its applications to a variety of settings of physical interest as well as its relationship with real observations. We argue that, as it stands, GR is deficient whether it is treated as a microscopic or a macroscopic theory of gravity. We briefly discuss some recent attempts at removing this shortcoming through the construction of a macroscopic theory of gravity. We point out that such macroscopic extensions of GR are likely to be nonunique and involve non-Riemannian geometrical frameworks

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,752

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

On the role of special relativity in general relativity.Harvey R. Brown - 1997 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 11 (1):67 – 81.
The ontology of General Relativity.Gustavo E. Romero - forthcoming - In M. Novello & S. E. Perez Bergliaffa (eds.), General Relativity and Gravitation. Cambridge University Press.
Pre-socratic quantum gravity.Gordon Belot & John Earman - 2001 - In Craig Callender & Nick Huggett (eds.), Physics Meets Philosophy at the Planck Scale. Cambridge University Press. pp. 213--55.
Why general relativity does need an interpretation.Gordon Belot - 1996 - Philosophy of Science 63 (3):88.
Gauge Theory Gravity with Geometric Calculus.David Hestenes - 2005 - Foundations of Physics 35 (6):903-970.
Quantum concepts in space and time.Roger Penrose & C. J. Isham (eds.) - 1986 - New York ;: Oxford University Press.
Is General Relativity Generally Relativistic?Roger Jones - 1980 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1980:363 - 381.
Flavour-oscillation clocks and the geometricity of general relativity.Eleanor Knox - 2010 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 61 (2):433-452.
General relativity needs no interpretation.Erik Curiel - 2009 - Philosophy of Science 76 (1):44-72.
Holism and structuralism in classical and quantum general relativity.Mauro Dorato & Massimo Pauri - 2006 - In Dean Rickles, Steven French & Juha Saatsi (eds.), The Structural Foundations of Quantum Gravity. Oxford: Oxford University Press. pp. 121-151.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-11-22

Downloads
53 (#299,829)

6 months
11 (#233,459)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Bird and the Dispositional Essentialist Account of Spatiotemporal Relations.Vassilios Livanios - 2008 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 39 (2):383-394.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Add more references