Re-presenting the case for representation

Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (5):1006-1007 (2001)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

O'Regan & Noë (O&N) present the most radical departure yet from traditional approaches to visual perception. However, internal representation cannot yet be abandoned. I will discuss: (1) recent evidence for very short-term pictorial representation of each fixation; (2) the possibility of abstract representation, largely unconsidered by the authors; and (3) that sensorimotor contingency theory requires internal visual retention and comparison.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,853

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Understanding the "active" in "enactive".Mark Rowlands - 2007 - Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 6 (4):427-443..
Varieties of visual representation.John Dilworth - 2002 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 32 (2):183-206.
A non-epistemic, non-pictorial, internal, material visual field.Edmond Wright - 2001 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (5):1010-1011.
Self-presentation, representation, and the self.Keith Lehrer - 2002 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 64 (2):412-430.
A sensorimotor account of vision and visual consciousness.J. Kevin O’Regan & Alva Noë - 2001 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (5):883-917.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
25 (#633,195)

6 months
5 (#639,314)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references