Inferences in judicial decisions about facts

In Jordi Ferrer Beltrán & Carmen Vázquez Rojas (eds.), Evidential legal reasoning: crossing civil law and common law traditions. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press (2020)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,592

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Inferences in judicial decisions about facts.Michele Taruffo - 2020 - In Jordi Ferrer Beltrán & Carmen Vázquez (eds.), Evidential Legal Reasoning: Crossing Civil Law and Common Law Traditions. Cambridge University Press.
Judges: Servants of the Law – But Also Servants of Justice?Irmgard Griss - 2019 - In Knut Almestad, Jean-Luc Baechler, Benedikt Bogason, Henrik Bull, Francis Delaporte, Luis José Diez Canseco Núñez, Peter Freeman, Vladimir Golitsyn, Irmgard Griss, Marc Jaeger, Koen Lenaerts, Paul Mahoney, Andreas Mundt, Sven Norberg, Toril Marie Øie, Þorgeir Örlygsson, Anne-José Paulsen, Georges Ravarani, Hubertus Schumacher, Vassilios Skouris, Gian-Flurin Steinegger, Sven Erik Svedman, Antonio Tizzano, Marc van der Woude, Bo Vesterdorf & Jean-Claude Wiwinius (eds.), The Art of Judicial Reasoning: Festschrift in Honour of Carl Baudenbacher. Cham: Springer Verlag. pp. 81-90.
Constitutional Problems of Depersonalizing Judicial Procedural Decisions.Algimantas Šindeikis - 2009 - Jurisprudencija: Mokslo darbu žurnalas 117 (3):41-58.
Argumentative Discourse as a Sign.Paul van den Hoven - unknown
How facts make law.Mark Greenberg - 2004 - In Scott Hershovitz (ed.), Exploring Law's Empire: The Jurisprudence of Ronald Dworkin. Oxford University Press. pp. 157-198.
Group-to-individual (G2i) inferences: challenges in modeling how the U.S. court system uses brain data.Valerie Gray Hardcastle - 2020 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 28 (1):51-68.
A Quantum Inductive Logic.John D. Norton - unknown
Reason, cause and principle in law: the normativity of context.D. Jabbari - 1999 - Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 19 (2):203-242.
Problems of increasing the transparency of the judicial system.Davletov Utkirbek Matmurotovich - unknown
On Universal Relevance in Legal Reasoning.Barbara Levenbook - 1984 - Law and Philosophy 3:1-23.
Understanding judicial discretion.Barry Hoffmaster - 1982 - Law and Philosophy 1 (1):21 - 55.
Interpreting the Rules of the Game.C. Mantzavinos - 2007 - In Christoph Engel Firtz Strack (ed.), The Impact of Court Procedure on the Psychology of Judicial Decision-Making. Baden-Baden: Nomos. pp. 16-30.
The judicial dialogue.Richard D. Rieke - 1991 - Argumentation 5 (1):39-55.
Surrounding the Hole in the Doughnut: Discretion and Deference in U.S. Immigration Law.Daniel Kanstroom - 1997 - Tulane Law Review 71:703-818.
Judicial decisions and judicial opinions: Relations between law, justice, and morality.Marcus G. Singer - 1983 - Criminal Justice Ethics 2 (1):17-30.

Analytics

Added to PP
2022-12-02

Downloads
0

6 months
0

Historical graph of downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references