Constitutional Problems of Depersonalizing Judicial Procedural Decisions

Jurisprudencija: Mokslo darbu žurnalas 117 (3):41-58 (2009)
  Copy   BIBTEX


This publication analyzes the issue of depersonalization in the field of constitutional substantiation of judicial resolutions, judgements, verdicts and rulings (hereinafter, judicial procedural decisions). Electronic databases are the primary source of information about judicial procedural resolutions for judges, reporters, as well as for the public-at-large. As for judicial practice, the data regarding parties of a case is depersonalised in these databases. Personal names are either replaced with initials, or a message “depersonalized data” is included. The constitutional substantiation for such a ruling by a judicial council is sought by means of this publication



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 76,419

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Impact of Constitutional Justice on Lithuaniaʼs Civil Procedure.Egidija Stauskienė - 2012 - Jurisprudencija: Mokslo darbu žurnalas 19 (3):1079-1099.
Judicial review: a practising judge's perspective.S. Breyer - 1999 - Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 19 (2):153-166.


Added to PP

11 (#846,528)

6 months
1 (#452,962)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references