Constitutional Problems of Depersonalizing Judicial Procedural Decisions
Jurisprudencija: Mokslo darbu žurnalas 117 (3):41-58 (2009)
Abstract
This publication analyzes the issue of depersonalization in the field of constitutional substantiation of judicial resolutions, judgements, verdicts and rulings (hereinafter, judicial procedural decisions). Electronic databases are the primary source of information about judicial procedural resolutions for judges, reporters, as well as for the public-at-large. As for judicial practice, the data regarding parties of a case is depersonalised in these databases. Personal names are either replaced with initials, or a message “depersonalized data” is included. The constitutional substantiation for such a ruling by a judicial council is sought by means of this publication
duomenų nuasmeninimas Konstitucinis Teismas nuosprendžiai Judicial Council judgements Constitutional Court oficiali konstitucinė doktrina bylos šal teismo procesiniai sprendimai Konstitucija Judicial resolutions Constitution teismo sprendimai Constitutional substantiation nutarimai ir nutartys verdicts and rulings konstitucinė jurisprudencija konstitucinė teisė Judicial procedural decisions depersonalisation of case parties Teisėjų taryba
My notes
Similar books and articles
The constitutional court's decision in the dispute between the supreme court and the judicial commission: Banishing judicial accountability?Simon Butt - unknown
The Right to Judicial Defence in the Jurisprudence of the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Lithuania.Armanas Abramavičius - 2009 - Jurisprudencija: Mokslo darbu žurnalas 117 (3):21-40.
The Implementation of Rulings of the Constitutional Court in Legislation (article in Lithuanian).Vytautas Sinkevičius - 2011 - Jurisprudencija: Mokslo darbu žurnalas 18 (2):497-516.
Impact of Constitutional Justice on Lithuaniaʼs Civil Procedure.Egidija Stauskienė - 2012 - Jurisprudencija: Mokslo darbu žurnalas 19 (3):1079-1099.
Courts, Expertise and Resource Allocation: Is there a Judicial 'Legitimacy Problem'?Keith Syrett - 2014 - Public Health Ethics 7 (2):112-122.
Judicial review: a practising judge's perspective.S. Breyer - 1999 - Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 19 (2):153-166.
Constitutional democracy and the legitimacy of judicial review.Samuel Freeman - 1990 - Law and Philosophy 9 (4):327 - 370.
Influence of the Jurisprudence of the Constitutional Court on the Criminal Procedure.Rima Ažubalytė - 2012 - Jurisprudencija: Mokslo darbu žurnalas 19 (3):1059-1078.
Judicial Review Without Rights: Some Problems for the Democratic Legitimacy of Structural Judicial Review.Adrienne Stone - 2008 - Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 28 (1):1-32.
Judicial rhetoric and constitutional identity: Comparative approaches to aliens' rights in the united kingdom and australia.Matthew Zagor - unknown
The Constitutional Doctrine of the Returning of the Powers of the Government upon the Election of the President of the Republic: Some Aspects of Argumentation.Vytautas Sinkevičius - 2009 - Jurisprudencija: Mokslo darbu žurnalas 118 (4):63-84.
Freedom of Expression v. Honour and Dignity: Is the Practice by Lithuania's Courts Constitutional? (text only in Lithuanian).Algimantas Šindeikis - 2010 - Jurisprudencija: Mokslo darbu žurnalas 120 (2):121-157.
On the Dissenting Opinions of the Constitutional Court Justices: Some Behavioural Aspects.Egidijus Kūris - 2012 - Jurisprudencija: Mokslo darbu žurnalas 19 (3):1031-1058.
Analytics
Added to PP
2013-12-09
Downloads
11 (#846,528)
6 months
1 (#452,962)
2013-12-09
Downloads
11 (#846,528)
6 months
1 (#452,962)
Historical graph of downloads