- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Moral Status of Animals from Marginal Cases
In Michael Bruce & Steven Barbone (eds.), Just the Arguments. Wiley‐Blackwell. pp. 263–264 (2011-09-16)
Abstract
This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)Author's Profile
moral status of animals from marginal cases animals, and whether they have moral status animals, if having moral status, its wrong to use them as we do pinning moral status on X, problematic argument from marginal cases, roots in ancient Greece Porphyry, the first to make it “argument from marginal cases” by Narveson Peter Singer's earliest contemporary formulations nonhuman animals, of possessing a moral status (modus ponens)
My notes
Similar books and articles
Moral Status of Animals from Marginal Cases.Julia Tanner - 2011 - In Michael Bruce Steven Barbone (ed.), Just the Arguments: 100 of the Most Important Arguments in Western Philosophy. Wiley-Blackwell.
The Argument from Marginal Cases: is species a relevant difference.Julia Tanner - 2011 - Croatian Journal of Philosophy 11 (2):225-235.
Marginal Humans, The Argument From Kinds, And The Similarity Argument.Julia Tanner - 2006 - Facta Universitatis, Series: Linguistics and Literature 5 (1):47-63.
The Argument from Marginal Cases and the Slippery Slope Objection.Julia K. Tanner - 2009 - Environmental Values 18 (1):51-66.
The Moral Status of Animals: Degrees of Moral Status and the Interest-Based Approach.Zorana Todorovic - 2021 - Philosophy and Society 2 (32):282–295.
Brain-Damaged Babies and Brain-Damaged Kittens: A Reexamination of the Argument From Marginal Cases.Elizabeth Foreman - 2014 - Journal of Animal Ethics 4 (1):58-73,.
Do Animals Have Rights and Does It Matter if They Don't?Mylan Engel Jr - 2016 - In Mylan Engel & Gary Lynn Comstock (eds.), The Moral Rights of Animals. Lanham, MD: Lexington. pp. 39-64.
Justice at the Margins: The Social Contract and the Challenge of Marginal Cases.Nathan Bauer & David Svolba - 2017 - Southern Journal of Philosophy 55 (1):51-67.
The Ethical Vegetarianism Argument.Robert L. Muhlnickel - 2011-09-16 - In Michael Bruce & Steven Barbone (eds.), Just the Arguments. Wiley‐Blackwell. pp. 265–268.
The Moral Status of Animals and Their Use as Experimental Subjects.Bernard E. Rollin - 1998 - In Helga Kuhse & Peter Singer (eds.), A Companion to Bioethics. Malden, Mass., USA: Wiley-Blackwell. pp. 495–509.
Analytics
Added to PP
2023-06-15
Downloads
10 (#1,221,969)
6 months
10 (#308,654)
2023-06-15
Downloads
10 (#1,221,969)
6 months
10 (#308,654)
Historical graph of downloads
Author's Profile
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-68866f4b87-kftwx uwo