Peirce and C. I. Lewis on Quale

Polish Journal of Philosophy 8 (2):43-62 (2014)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The debates about qualia are common in contemporary analytical philosophy, especially in the area of philosophy of mind or epistemology. Notwithstanding the significance of this notion in present-day investigations, there still appears to be a lack of agreement over how to understand the term “quale”. Due to this fact, our goal is to shed light on the concept of quale as it entered the modern history of philosophy. Strictly speaking, our concern shall be devoted to the American pragmatist philosophy of C. S. Peirce and C. I. Lewis. Therefore, we intend to outline the understanding of quale within Peirce's theory of categories at the beginning, and afterwards we shall present Lewis' remarks on quale in the context of his theory of the given. This approach will not only provide the grounds for relating Peirce's and Lewis' views with each other, but also it will let us interpret Lewis' notion of quale within the pragmatic framework.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,672

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Peirce’s Summum Bonum and the Ethical Views of C. I. Lewis and John Dewey.Morton White - 1999 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 59 (4):1029-1037.
Peirce's and Lewis's theories of induction.Zhongying Cheng - 1969 - The Hague,: Martinus Nijhoff.
Why not Lewis?Joel Isaac - 2006 - Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 42 (1):54-60.
Lewis, Peirce, and the complexity of classical pragmatism.Richard S. Robin - 2006 - Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 42 (1):45-53.
A Pragmatic Appropriation of Kant: Lewis and Peirce.Sandra B. Rosenthal - 2002 - Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 38 (1/2):253 - 266.
How to be a Pragmatist: C. I. Lewis and Humean Skepticism.John Greco - 2006 - Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 42 (1):24-31.
Quale liberalismo per quale sinistra?Michelangelo Bovero - 1997 - Iride: Filosofia e Discussione Pubblica 10 (3):467-485.
Quale "diritto" e quale "società"?M. A. Raschini - 1990 - Filosofia Oggi 13 (3):387-392.
Quale famiglia per quale società?Michele Corsi - 2007 - Iride: Filosofia e Discussione Pubblica 20 (1):25-36.
Quale cultura per quale politica?Franco Sbarberi - 2005 - Iride: Filosofia e Discussione Pubblica 18 (3):569-578.

Analytics

Added to PP
2016-01-24

Downloads
21 (#733,828)

6 months
6 (#509,130)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Joanna Helena Szelegieniec
Jagiellonian University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references