"Kétszemélyes egyetem": tizenegy beszélgetés

& (eds.)
Budapest: Magvető (1990)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Add categories

Keywords

Reprint years

Call number

QC173.98.F54 1991

ISBN(s)

9631416747   9789631416749

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,592

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

“It might be this, it should be that…” uncertainty and doubt in day-to-day research practice.Jutta Schickore & Nora Hangel - 2019 - European Journal for Philosophy of Science 9 (2):1-21.
“It might be this, it should be that…” uncertainty and doubt in day-to-day research practice.Jutta Schickore & Nora Hangel - 2019 - European Journal for Philosophy of Science 9 (2):1-21.
What oral historians and historians of science can learn from each other.Paul Merchant - 2019 - British Journal for the History of Science 52 (4):673-688.
What’s Special about Basic Research?Jane Calvert - 2006 - Science, Technology, and Human Values 31 (2):199-220.
Natura iuris: természetjogtan & jogpozitivizmus & magyar jogelmélet : a Miskolci Egyetem és a Miskolci Akadémiai Bizottsaǵ által 2001. október 5-6-án rendezett konferencia anyaga.Miklâos Szabâo, Attila Badâo, Miskolci Egyetem & Miskolci Akadâemiai Bizottsâag (eds.) - 2002 - Miskolc: Bíbor.
Taking the Naturalistic Turn, Or How Real Philosophy of Science Is Done.William Bechtel & Werner Callebaut (eds.) - 1993 - Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
How Do Scientists Perceive the Relationship Between Ethics and Science? A Pilot Study of Scientists’ Appeals to Values.Caleb L. Linville, Aidan C. Cairns, Tyler Garcia, Bill Bridges, Jonathan Herington, James T. Laverty & Scott Tanona - 2023 - Science and Engineering Ethics 29 (3):1-23.
Reflections on the Use of Interviews in the History of Science: Who Will Write the History of Science?Benno Müller-Hill - 2001 - History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences 23 (1):105 - 116.
Paradigms of Sex Research and Women in Stem.Jeffrey W. Lockhart - 2021 - Gender and Society 35 (3):449-475.
Gender Segregation in Elite Academic Science.Cassandra Tansey, Anne E. Lincoln & Elaine Howard Ecklund - 2012 - Gender and Society 26 (5):693-717.
Making Sense of Science, University, and Industry: Sensemaking Narratives of Finnish and Israeli Scientists.Elina I. Mäkinen & Adi Sapir - 2023 - Minerva 61 (2):175-198.
What Scientists Say about the Changing Risk Calculation in the Marine Environment under the Harper Government of Canada.Melanie G. Wiber & Allain J. Barnett - 2019 - Science, Technology, and Human Values 44 (1):29-51.
Simple or simplistic? Scientists’ views on Occam’s razor.Hauke Riesch - 2010 - Theoria 25 (1):75-90.
Dialogues with scientists and sages: the search for unity.Renée Weber (ed.) - 1986 - New York: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
“Everyone may think whatever they like, but scientists...”: Or how and to what end plant scientists manage the science-society relationship. [REVIEW]K. Mogendorff, H. Molder, B. Gremmen & C. Woerkum - unknown

Analytics

Added to PP
2023-05-19

Downloads
5 (#1,533,504)

6 months
2 (#1,192,610)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references