Metaphysik als Traumatologie – Zu Heidegger und Sloterdijk

Revista Portuguesa de Filosofia 71 (2-3):495-514 (2015)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Resumo A abordagem aqui apresentada insere-se no âmbito do pensamento metafísico e pós-metafísico da ‘filosofia continental’ e dedica-se, em particular, aos contributos de Heidegger e Sloterdijk. Não se pretende fazer nem um resumo completo, nem um mero resumo dos pensamentos dos dois autores sobre a questão da metafísica. Antes, focar um aspecto particular que inere à noção de metafísica tal como foi pensada não só por Heidegger e Sloterdijk, mas também por outros pensadores pós-tradicionais: o aspeto ‘traumatológico’. A escolha deste termo deve-se à intenção de mostrar que há uma afinidade lógica entre um dos problemas fundamentais da metafísica e a lógica do trauma. A primeira parte do artigo guiar-se-á pela famosa questão “O que é a Metafísica?”, dando especial relevo aos dois aspetos do ‘inquietante’ e do ‘nada’ nas obras de Heidegger e Sloterdijk. A segunda parte tem a função de evidenciar a ‘traumatologia’ destas reflexões metafísicas. Palavras-chave : antropologia, Heidegger, metafísica, Sloterdijk, traumaThe analysis presented in this article falls within the framework of metaphysical and postmetaphysical thought in the so-called ‘continental philosophy’ and focuses particularly on the contributions of Heidegger and Sloterdijk. It is not intended to give here a complete summary, or a mere summary of the thoughts of the two authors on the question of metaphysics. Instead, I shall focus on an aspect that, in my view, inheres not only the notion of metaphysics carried out by Heidegger and Sloterdijk, but also by other post-traditional philosophers: the ‘traumatological’ aspect. The choice of this term is motivated by the intention to show that there is a logical affinity between one of the most fundamental problems of metaphysics and the logic of trauma. The first part of the article is guided by the famous question “What is Metaphysics?”, with special emphasis on the two aspects of the ‘uncanny’ and the ‘nothing’ in the works of Heidegger and Sloterdijk. The second part aims to highlight the logic of trauma that inheres to these metaphysical reflections. Keywords : anthropology, Heidegger, metaphysics, Sloterdijk, trauma

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,709

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The Coming-to-the-World of the Human Animal.Marie-Eve Morin - 2011 - In Stuart Elden (ed.), Sloterdijk Now. Polity. pp. 77-95.
The art of philosophy: wisdom as a practice.Peter Sloterdijk - 2012 - New York: Columbia University Press.
Sloterdijk.Jean-Pierre Couture - 2015 - Malden, MA: Polity.
Nicht gerettet: Versuche nach Heidegger.Peter Sloterdijk - 2001 - Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.
Nearness and Da-sein: The Spatiality of Being and Time.Peter Sloterdijk - 2012 - Theory, Culture and Society 29 (4-5):36-42.
De utopie Van Peter Sloterdijk: 'Regels voor het mensenpark'.Hans Achterhuis - 2002 - Tijdschrift Voor Filosofie 64 (3):451 - 478.

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-10-26

Downloads
3 (#1,708,048)

6 months
3 (#962,988)

Historical graph of downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Bernhard Josef Sylla
Universidade do Minho

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references