Does Theism Need a Theodicy?

Canadian Journal of Philosophy 18 (2):287-311 (1988)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

To many atheists the existence of evil seems to provide a conclusive argument against the existence of God. God is by definition omnipotent and perfectly good; a perfectly good being will remove evil in so far as he can, an omnipotent being can remove any evil he chooses, so if there is a God there will be no evil, but there is evil, hence there is no God. Theists normally challenge this argument by challenging the premiss that a perfectly good being will remove evil in so far as he can. The theistic defence is usually put as the defence that many evils are logically necessary conditions of greater goods, and hence a perfectly good being may allow them to occur in order to bring about the greater good; so a perfectly good being may well allow some evils to occur.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,642

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Does theism need a theodicy?Richard Swinburne - 1988 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 18 (2):287 - 311.
Notes Towards an Ash՟arite Theodicy.G. Legenhausen - 1988 - Religious Studies 24 (2):257 - 266.
An Attempt to Defend Theism.W. D. Hudson - 1964 - Philosophy 39 (147):18 - 28.
Possible Worlds and the Problem of Evil.Klaas Johannes Kraay - 2002 - Dissertation, University of Toronto (Canada)
Explanation and the Problem of Evil.Paul Draper & Trent Dougherty - 2014 - In Justin P. McBrayer & Daniel Howard-Snyder (eds.), The Blackwell Companion to The Problem of Evil. Wiley. pp. 67–82.
The defeat of evil and the norms of hope.John Pittard - 2020 - Analytic Philosophy 62 (4):317-335.

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-02-17

Downloads
8 (#1,345,183)

6 months
30 (#108,935)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

References found in this work

Philosophical Explanations.Robert Nozick - 1981 - Mind 93 (371):450-455.
Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge.Hugh Lehman - 1972 - Philosophy of Science 39 (1):92-95.
The probabilistic argument from evil.Alvin Plantinga - 1979 - Philosophical Studies 35 (1):1 - 53.
Philosophical Explanations. [REVIEW]Robert Nozick - 1981 - Philosophy 58 (223):118-121.

View all 6 references / Add more references