The Evidential Argument From Evil in Recent Analytic Philosophy

Dissertation, Purdue University (1995)

Edward N. Martin
Liberty University
The problem of evil is the most difficult problem confronting theistic belief. If God exists, why is there evil in the world? William Rowe has presented a forceful argument from the evil in the world to the nonexistence of God. Starting with Moore's conception of ethics, he examines a particular instance of evil and states that he cannot see any resulting good sufficient to justify E's occurrence. Since an omnipotent, all-good being would not permit E unless there was some good which would justify him, and since the traditional theistic conception of God includes God's being omnipotent and all-good, it is reasonable to conclude that God does not exist. Rowe's argument is called an evidential argument from evil. I argue that there are good reasons to think that Rowe's argument is not sound for the following reasons. There are goods we know of which could partly justify God in permitting E. Since God is omniscient, there could be goods he knows of which are beyond our ken yet which he understands and is able to actualize. It is theoretically difficult to explain exactly how some evil E weighs against a theory such as theism. Salient features of John Hick's soul-making theodicy can be brought to bear against Rowe by moral considerations concerning God's duties as the creator of the world. I argue that the amount of evil in the world is not excessive for the enterprise of soul-making, i.e., for God to bring about moral and spiritual maturation in significantly free moral agents
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 72,577
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Peter Van Inwagen on the Problem of Evil.William L. Rowe - 2008 - Faith and Philosophy 25 (4):425-431.
What No Eye has Seen: The Skeptical Theist Response to Rowe's Evidential Argument From Evil.Nick Trakakis - 2012 - Philo: The Journal of the Society of Humanist Philosophers 6 (2):250-266.
Evidential Arguments From Evil.Richard Otte - 2000 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 48 (1):1-10.
The Nihilistic Consequences of the Argument From Evil.Robert Lehe - 2009 - International Philosophical Quarterly 49 (4):427-437.
Surplus Evil.Daniel Howard-Snyder - 1990 - Philosophical Quarterly 40:78-86.
Evil and the Existence of God.Fred Brian Keenan - 2003 - Dissertation, University of Colorado at Boulder
The Problem of Evil and the Attributes of God.James A. Keller - 1989 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 26 (3):155 - 171.


Added to PP index

Total views

Recent downloads (6 months)

How can I increase my downloads?


Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.

My notes