Depo‐provera: Loopholes and Double Standards

Hastings Center Report 17 (5):3-4 (1987)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

2012

DOI

10.2307/3562660

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,990

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Depo‐Provera: Contraceptive Risk?Allan Rosenfield - 1980 - Hastings Center Report 10 (2):4-4.
Depo‐Provera and Contraceptive Risk: A Case Study of Values in Conflict.Carol Levine - 1979 - Hastings Center Report 9 (4):8-11.
Depo‐provera in the First World.Robert T. McDonough - 1988 - Hastings Center Report 18 (4):44-44.
Double‐Mindedness.David McCurdy - 1995 - Hastings Center Report 25 (2):2-3.
Standards of Care.Alvin Novik - 1989 - Hastings Center Report 19 (4):40-41.
Standards of care-reply.G. Annas - 1989 - Hastings Center Report 19 (4):41-41.
Toward universal standards.John E. Jesus - 2012 - Hastings Center Report 42 (3):8.
Taking Care? The Depo-Provera Debate.A. Ndrew Russell - 1999 - In Tamara Kohn & Rosemary McKechnie (eds.), Extending the boundaries of care: medical ethics and caring practices. New York, N.Y.: Berg. pp. 1065.
Plan B and the Doctrine of Double Effect.Rebecca Stangl - 2009 - Hastings Center Report 39 (4):21-25.
Case Studies in Bioethics: The Psychiatrist as Double Agent.Daniel Callahan & Willard Gaylin - 1974 - Hastings Center Report 4 (1):12.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-11-22

Downloads
8 (#1,336,069)

6 months
2 (#1,448,208)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references