Review of Rex Martin: Rawls and rights [Book Review]

Theoria 53 (1):67 (1987)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Add categories

Keywords

Reprint years

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,783

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Rawls and Rights.Rex Martin - 1987 - Noûs 21 (3):445-448.
Rex Martin, Rawls and Rights. [REVIEW]Thomas Carson - 1986 - Philosophy in Review 6:167-169.
Rex Martin, Rawls and Rights Reviewed by. [REVIEW]Thomas L. Carson - 1986 - Philosophy in Review 6 (4):167-169.
Book Review:Rawls and Rights. Rex Martin. [REVIEW]Bart Schultz - 1988 - Ethics 99 (1):155-.
Rex Martin and David A. Reidy, Eds., Rawls’s Law of Peoples: A Realistic Utopia?: New York: Blackwell Publishing, 2006. [REVIEW]Daniel Bonevac - 2008 - Human Rights Review 9 (4):553-555.
Human Rights and Toleration in Rawls.Mitch Avila - 2011 - Human Rights Review 12 (1):1-14.
Human rights without foundations.Joseph Raz - 2010 - In J. Tasioulas & S. Besson (eds.), The Philosphy of International Law. Oxford University Press.
William Talbott’s Which Rights Should be Universal? [REVIEW]David A. Reidy, D. J. & D. Ph - 2008 - Human Rights Review 9 (2):181-191.
A natureza dinâmica dos direitos humanos: a crítica de Rawls ao universalismo Moral.Sanja Ivic - 2010 - Trans/Form/Ação 33 (2).
Which Rights Are Basic Rights?Michael Cuffaro - 2007 - Gnosis 9 (1):1-11.
Book Review: Rawls and Rights. [REVIEW]Alan S. Rosenbaum - 1989 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 19 (4):518-521.
International Justice and Human Rights in the Political Philosophy of John Rawls.John Patrick Hayden - 1999 - Dissertation, University of South Africa (South Africa)
A Rawlsian argument for extending family-based immigration benefits to same-sex couples.Matthew J. Lister - 2007 - University of Memphis Law Review 37 (Summer):763-764.
Justification and Application: The Revival of the Rawls–Habermas Debate.Jørgen Pedersen - 2012 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 42 (3):399-432.
An Engaged Buddhist Response to John Rawls's "The Law of Peoples".Sallie B. King - 2006 - Journal of Religious Ethics 34 (4):637 - 661.

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-02-04

Downloads
0

6 months
0

Historical graph of downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references