Semantic analysis in the philosophy of mind: A reply to Ellis

Australasian Journal of Philosophy 56 (1):68-71 (1978)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This Article does not have an abstract

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,779

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Lehrer and Ellis on incorrigibility.Charles E. M. Dunlop - 1977 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 55 (3):201-5.
Two theories of indicative conditionals: Reply to Brian Ellis.Frank Jackson - 1984 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 62 (1):67 – 76.
Gruzalski and Ellis on utilitarianism.Peter Galle - 1981 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 59 (3):332 – 337.
Ellis and Lierse on dispositional essentialism.Stephen Mumford - 1995 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 73 (4):606 – 612.
Minimal incorrigibility.Robert C. Solomon - 1975 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 53 (3):254-56.
A note on incorrigibility and authority.Frank Jackson - 1967 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 45 (3):358-363.
Jackson on incorrigibility.Frank G. Verges - 1974 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 52 (3):243-50.
Incorrigibity and classification.John H. Chandler - 1970 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 48 (1):101-6.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
39 (#397,178)

6 months
9 (#438,283)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Alan Sussman
University of Chicago

Citations of this work

Replies to Sussman and Dunlop.Brian Ellis - 1978 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 56 (2):171 – 173.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Truth and meaning.Donald Davidson - 1967 - Synthese 17 (1):304-323.
Truth and meaning.Donald Davidson - 1967 - Synthese 17 (1):304-323.
True to the facts.Donald Davidson - 1969 - Journal of Philosophy 66 (21):748-764.
Avowals are more corrigible than you think.Brian Ellis - 1976 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 54 (2):116-122.

Add more references