Results for 'Incorrigibility'

213 found
Order:
  1. Defining Incorrigibility.George S. Pappas - 1975 - Personalist 56 (4):395-402.
  2. Incorrigibility.Richard Warner - 1993 - In Howard M. Robinson (ed.), Objections to Physicalism. Oxford University Press.
  3.  16
    Incorrigibility, the Mental, and Materialism.Gerald Doppelt - 1977 - Philosophy Research Archives 3:504-536.
    This paper constitutes a thoroughgoing critique of Rorty's interesting attempt to characterize the mental and its elimination within materialism in terms of the incorrigibility of mental reports. I elucidate, criticize, and improve the concept of incorrigibility his position requires. Then I argue: that although mental-state reports are as corrigible as physical reports, this reflects contingent matters which do not affect the boundary of the mental and the physical; that even if the familiar paradigm mental-event reports are incorrigible, there (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  4. Incorrigibility: The Standard Contemporary Doctrine.Earl Winkler - 1969 - Personalist 50 (2):179-193.
  5. Incorrigibility.Francis W. Dauer - 1981 - Ratio (Misc.) 23 (December):98-113.
  6.  30
    Incorrigibility.George Nakhnikian - 1968 - Philosophical Quarterly 18 (July):207-15.
  7.  9
    Incorrigibility Laws: The State's Role in Resolving Intrafamily Conflict.Martin Guggenheim - 1985 - Criminal Justice Ethics 4 (1):11-19.
    (1985). Incorrigibility laws: The state's role in resolving intrafamily conflict. Criminal Justice Ethics: Vol. 4, No. 1, pp. 11-19. doi: 10.1080/0731129X.1985.9991767.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  8. Incorrigibility, Behaviourism and Predictionism.George W. Roberts - 1974 - In Renford Bambrough (ed.), Wisdom: Twelve Essays. Oxford: Blackwell.
  9. The Incorrigibility of First Person Disavowals.John Exdell & James Hamilton - 1975 - Personalist 56 (4):389-394.
  10. Incorrigibility Revisited.Laurence F. Mucciolo - 1974 - Personalist 55 (3):253-260.
  11.  48
    Incorrigibility and Central-State Materialism.George S. Pappas - 1976 - Philosophical Studies 29 (June):445-56.
  12.  50
    Incorrigibility and the Mental.Gerald Doppelt - 1978 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 56 (1):3-20.
  13. The Incorrigible Social Meaning of Video Game Imagery.Stephanie Patridge - 2010 - Ethics and Information Technology 13 (4):303-312.
    In this paper, I consider a particular amoralist challenge against those who would morally criticize our single-player video play, viz., “come on, it’s only a game!” The amoralist challenge with which I engage gains strength from two facts: the activities to which the amoralist lays claim are only those that do not involve interactions with other rational or sentient creatures, and the amoralist concedes that there may be extrinsic, consequentialist considerations that support legitimate moral criticisms. I argue that the amoralist (...)
    Direct download (10 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   26 citations  
  14.  9
    Incorrigible Norms: Foundationalist Theories of Normative Authority.Linda Radzik - 2000 - Southern Journal of Philosophy 38 (4):633-649.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  15. Defining Incorrigibility.George S. Pappas - 1975 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 56 (4):395.
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  16.  44
    Incorrigibility, Knowledge and Justification.George S. Pappas - 1974 - Philosophical Studies 25 (April):219-25.
  17.  66
    Incorrigibility, Materialism, and Causation.David M. Armstrong - 1976 - Philosophical Studies 30 (August):125-28.
  18.  89
    Pappas, Incorrigibility, and Science.George Bailey - 1979 - Philosophical Studies 35 (April):319-321.
  19.  32
    Minimal Incorrigibility.Robert C. Solomon - 1975 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 53 (3):254-56.
  20. Incorrigibility, Avowals and the Concept of Unconscious Desire.S. Marc Cohen - 1967 - Dissertation, Cornell University
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  21.  10
    Incorrigible Beliefs and Democratic Deliberation: A Critique of Stanley Fish.John S. Brady - 2006 - Constellations 13 (3):374-393.
  22. Incorrigibility: The Standard Contemporary Doctrine.Earl Winkler - 1969 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 50 (2):179.
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  23. The Incorrigibility of First Person Disavowals.John Exdell - 1975 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 56 (4):389.
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  24. The Incorrigibility of the Cogito.Jonathan Harrison - 1984 - Mind 93 (July):321-335.
  25.  70
    On Incorrigibility and Eliminative Materialism.William R. Carter - 1975 - Philosophical Studies 28 (2):113-21.
  26. Pain and Incorrigibility.Peter Langland-Hassan - forthcoming - In J. Corns (ed.), Routledge Handbook of Philosophy of Pain. Routledge.
    This chapter (from Routledge's forthcoming handbook on the philosophy of pain) considers the question of whether people are always correct when they judge themselves to be in pain, or not in pain. While I don't show sympathy for traditional routes to the conclusion that people are "incorrigible" in their pain judgments, I explore--and perhaps even advocate--a different route to such incorrigibility. On this low road to incorrigibility, a sensory state's being judged unpleasant is what makes it a pain (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  27. Incorrigible Norms: Foundationalist Theories of Normative Authority.Linda Radzik - 2000 - Southern Journal of Philosophy 38 (4):633-649.
    What makes a norm a genuinely authoritative guide to action? For many theorists, the answer takes a foundationalist form, analogous to foundationalism in epistemology. They say that there is at least one norm that is justified in itself. On most versions, the norm is said to be incorrigibly authoritative. All other norms are justified in virtue of their connection with it. This essay argues that all such foundationalist theories of normative authority fail because they cannot give an account of the (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  28.  3
    The Incorrigibles.W. W. Mellor - 1965 - Philosophical Quarterly 15 (58):35-42.
    No categories
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  29. Psychopaths, Incorrigible Racists, and the Faces of Responsibility.Dana Kay Nelkin - 2015 - Ethics 125 (2):357-390.
    Psychopaths pose a puzzle. The pleasure they take in the pain of others suggests that they are the paradigms of blameworthiness, while their psychological incapacities provide them with paradigm excuses on plausible accounts of moral responsibility. I begin by assessing two influential responses: one that claims that psychopaths are morally blameworthy in one sense and not in another, and one that takes the two senses of blameworthiness to be inseparable. I offer a new argument that psychopaths, as understood in the (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   18 citations  
  30. Incorrigibility as the Mark of the Mental.Richard Rorty - 1970 - Journal of Philosophy 67 (June):399-424.
  31. Incorrigibility Revisited.L. F. Mucciolo - 1974 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 55 (3):253.
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  32. Analyticity and Incorrigibility.Manuel Campos - 2003 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 66 (3):689-708.
    The traditional point of view on analyticity implies that truth in virtue only of meaning entails a priori acceptability and vice versa. The argument for this claim is based on the idea that meaning as it concerns truth and meaning as it concerns competence are one and the same thing. In this paper I argue that the extensions of these notions do not coincide. I hold that truth in virtue of meaning— truth for semantic reasons—doesn't imply a priori acceptability, and (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  33.  39
    Access, Incorrigibility, and Identity.Alan Tormey - 1973 - Journal of Philosophy 70 (5):115.
  34.  87
    Minkus-Benes on Incorrigibility.Bernard Berofsky - 1958 - Mind 67 (April):264-266.
  35.  55
    Incorrigible Advocates.Nienke Doornbos & Leny E. de Groot-Van Leeuwen - 2012 - Legal Ethics 15 (2):335-355.
    Inspired by the work of Richard Abel, the authors conduct a N=1 study into the career path and disciplinary records of a Dutch immigration advocate. Their aim is to offer explanations as to why some lawyers seem so impervious to discipline. The authors analyse the case from three different angles: (1) characteristics of the disciplinary system (2) the social network of the advocate in question, including his professional network, and (3) the advocate?s personality. According to the authors, the key to (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  36.  20
    Infallibility and Incorrigibility.Bengt Hansson - 2006 - In Erik J. Olsson (ed.), Knowledge and Inquiry: Essays on the Pragmatism of Isaac Levi. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. pp. 65.
  37.  13
    The Electroencephalogram Argument Against Incorrigibility.Gregory Sheridan - 1969 - American Philosophical Quarterly 6 (1):62-70.
  38. Brain Processes and Incorrigibility - a Reply to Professor Baier.J. J. C. Smart - 1962 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 40 (1):68-70.
  39.  19
    Basic Sentences and Incorrigibility.Bruce Waters - 1942 - Philosophy of Science 9 (July):239-244.
    The question of basic and incorrigible sentences has appeared in connection with certain recent attempts to refine and re-define the meaning of Empiricism. More directly still, the question appears in connection with the problem of verification. It is noteworthy that the question of protocols, more than any other issue, has served to draw out the philosophical differences between the original Wiener Kreis and the Cambridge Analysts. Yet despite their differences both schools are agreed that basic sentences in some sense of (...)
    Direct download (10 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  40.  2
    Analyticity and Incorrigibility.Manuel Campos - 2003 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 66 (3):689-708.
    The traditional point of view on analyticity implies that truth in virtue only of meaning entails a priori acceptability and vice versa. The argument for this claim is based on the idea that meaning as it concerns truth and meaning as it concerns competence are one and the same thing. In this parer I argue that the extensions of these notions do not coincide. I hold that truth in virtue of meaning---truth for semantic reasons--doesn’t imply a priori acceptability, and that (...)
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  41.  47
    Facing Ourselves: Incorrigibility and the Mind-Body Problem.Richard Warner - 1996 - Journal of Consciousness Studies 3 (3):217-30.
    In the keynote essay, David Chalmers proposes that we explain consciousness by a non-reductive theory of experience which adds new basic principles to the laws of nature. This essay endorses Chalmers’ proposal but argues -- contrary to Chalmers -- that the principles of such a theory interfere with purely physical laws, since the principles entail violations of physical conservation laws. The essay argues that the qualified incorrigibility of the mental nonetheless provides compelling reason to opt for a non-reductive theory.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  42.  40
    Happiness, Cerebroscopes and Incorrigibility: Prospects for Neuroeudaimonia.Stephanie M. Hare & Nicole A. Vincent - 2016 - Neuroethics 9 (1):69-84.
    Suppose you want to live a happy life. Who should you turn to for advice? We normally think that we know best about our own happiness. But recent work in psychology and neuroscience suggests that we are often mistaken about our own natures, and that sometimes scientists know us better than we know ourselves. Does this mean that to live a happy life we should ask scientists for advice rather than relying on our introspection? In what follows, we highlight ways (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  43.  15
    The Concept of Incorrigibility.Richard Robinson - 1972 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 1 (4):427-441.
    In the last thirty-five years philosophers have often referred to corrigible and incorrigible statements or judgements. This usage probably began with the Inaugural lecture of the Wykeham Professor of logic at Oxford University on 5 March, 1936, which was called ‘Truth and Corrigibility’ and discussed the theory that ‘all judgements are corrigible'. Price did not say there that he himself invented this usage. On the contrary, he said that “it is maintained by many philosophers that all judgements are corrigible”. But (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  44.  26
    Statements and Incorrigibility.Sidney D. Johnson - 1970 - Mind 79 (October):600-601.
  45.  74
    Are There Any Incorrigible Metaphysical Statements?J. L. Mackie - 1963 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 41:12.
  46.  21
    Richard Robinson on Incorrigibility.James Ford - 1974 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 4 (1):199 - 200.
    Richard Robinson has argued that “no consistent and useful and desirable meaning” can be given to the philosophical terms “corrigible” and “incorrigible” so long as one espouses a bivalent theory of truth with the law of excluded middle operative. The crux of his argument is that the corrigibility-incorrigibility distinction can be shown to be redundant since, in effect, incorrigibility is materially equivalent to truth and corrigibility materially equivalent to falsehood. Robinson understands the correcting of a proposition to consist (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  47.  41
    Jackson on Incorrigibility.Frank G. Verges - 1974 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 52 (3):243-50.
  48.  50
    On Defining Incorrigibility.Edward Kroiter - 1972 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 50 (3):279-282.
  49. Factual and Logical Incorrigibility.Lars Aagaard-Mogensen - 1972 - Danish Yearbook of Philosophy 9:7-14.
  50.  69
    A Note on Incorrigibility and Authority.Frank Jackson - 1967 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 45 (3):358-363.
1 — 50 / 213