Die Bretter, die gebohrt werden, bleiben dick: Deregulierung der Politik scheitert an den Bedingungen der Massendemokratie. Kommentar zu Reiner Eichenberger: „Bessere Politik dank Deregulierung des politischen Prozesses“

Analyse & Kritik 23 (1):69-75 (2001)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Deregulation of the political process could be an instrument to reduce the overwhelming power of specialised interest groups and tighten the links between voters and politicians. But deregulation causes serious problems. Reputation pooling by international political enterprises depends on a transnational public sphere which is quite unrealistic. And political enterprises are not capable of shaping candidates for public service. Putting political finance in the hands of voters simply moves lobbying activities to the level of voters and does not change the asymmetrical influence of interest groups. Above all, the idea that political enterprises exchange experts in parliament does not fit into the crucial principle of parliamentary government and political responsibility.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,932

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Interest groups as one of the extra-parliamentary institutions of interest representation.A. Liasota - 2016 - Epistemological studies in Philosophy, Social and Political Sciences 1:20-28.
Politik - Wesen, Wiederkehr, Entlastung.Miguel Skirl - 2005 - Berlin: Duncker Und Humblot.

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-04-27

Downloads
3 (#1,732,766)

6 months
3 (#1,207,210)

Historical graph of downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references