- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Replies
In Dominic Murphy & Michael Bishop (eds.), Stich. Wiley‐Blackwell. pp. 190–252 (2009-03-20)
Abstract
This chapter contains sections titled: Reply to Devitt and Jackson Reply to Egan Reply to Cowie Reply to Goldman Reply to Sterelny Reply to Prinz Reply to Godfrey‐Smith Reply to Sosa Reply to Bishop References.Author's Profile
reply to Devitt and Jackson Jackson endorsing ‐ on how eliminativism debate becomes “embroiled” in theory of reference reply to Egan – Egan and paper “Is there a role for representational content in scientific psychology?” reply to Cowie ‐ Quine reminding us in “the immortal words of Adolf Meyer, where it doesn't itch don't scratch” reply to Goldman ‐ Shaun Nichols and author argueing over ‘simulation’ used in literature on mindreading Prinz's engaging and fact‐filled chapter ‐ focusing on moral nativism Bishop's rich and challenging paper ‐ detailed, largely sympathetic and exceptionally well‐informed overview of work in epistemology searching in the wrong place in the wrong way pragmatism vs. strategic reliabilism
My notes
Similar books and articles
Replies.Noam Chomsky - 2003 - In Louise M. Antony & Norbert Hornstein (eds.), Chomsky and His Critics. Oxford, UK: Blackwell. pp. 255–328.
Reaffirming the poverty of the stimulus argument: A reply to the replies.Joel W. Lidz & S. Waxman - 2004 - Cognition 93 (2):157-165.
Replies to Commentators.Keith DeRose - 2020 - International Journal for the Study of Skepticism 10 (1):68-104.
Replies to Commentators.Keith DeRose - 2019 - International Journal for the Study of Skepticism 9 (3):284-320.
Analytics
Added to PP
2023-06-15
Downloads
9 (#1,280,687)
6 months
7 (#491,733)
2023-06-15
Downloads
9 (#1,280,687)
6 months
7 (#491,733)
Historical graph of downloads
Author's Profile
Citations of this work
Vicious minds: Virtue epistemology, cognition, and skepticism.Lauren Olin & John M. Doris - 2014 - Philosophical Studies 168 (3):665-692.
If Folk Intuitions Vary, Then What?Edouard Machery, Ron Mallon, Shaun Nichols & Stephen P. Stich - 2012 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 86 (3):618-635.
The Reference of Proper Names: Testing Usage and Intuitions.Michael Devitt & Nicolas Porot - 2018 - Cognitive Science 42 (5):1552-1585.
Lies, damned lies, and statistics: An empirical investigation of the concept of lying.Adam J. Arico & Don Fallis - 2013 - Philosophical Psychology 26 (6):790 - 816.
Testing for the phenomenal: Intuition, metacognition, and philosophical methodology.Miguel Egler - 2019 - Mind and Language 35 (1):48-66.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-68866f4b87-sz9d2 uwo