Principled Ethics Review: Governance Arrangements for University Research Ethics Committees

Research Ethics 5 (3):110-112 (2009)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This, the third seminar organised by the AREC university sector committee, included short presentations followed by parallel workshops. These proposed and explored basic principles for ethical review in the context of current models within the university REC sector. In this report, following an introduction, each of the speakers/workshop leaders summarizes their own perspective on the issues raised and discussed.

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1177/174701610900500305

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,150

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

The ethical review of student research in the context of the governance arrangements for research ethics committees.R. Ashcroft & M. Parker - 2003 - In Sue Eckstein (ed.), Manual for research ethics committees. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Response to Schrag: What are ethics committees for anyway? A defence of social science research ethics review.Sean Jennings - 2012 - Research Ethics 8 (2):87-96.
The ‘New Governance Arrangements for Research Ethics Committees’: Policy-Shift and Equivocation on Matters of Illegal Research.Christopher Roy-Toole - 2009 - Research Ethics 5 (4):160-161.
Getting beyond form filling: The role of institutional governance in human research ethics. [REVIEW]Gary Allen - 2008 - Journal of Academic Ethics 6 (2):105-116.
New governance arrangements for research ethics committees: is facilitating research achieved at the cost of participants' interest.E. Cave - 2002 - Journal of Medical Ethics 28 (5):318-321.
Ethics and research governance: the views of researchers, health-care professionals and other stakeholders.Nina Hallowell, Sarah Cooke, Gill Crawford, Michael Parker & Anneke Lucassen - 2008 - Clinical Ethics 3 (2):85-90.
Ethical Review of Research on Human Subjects at Unilever: Reflections on Governance.Mark Sheehan, Vernon Marti & Tony Roberts - 2013 - Bioethics 28 (6):284-292.
Tis but a scratch: The human tissue act and the use of tissue for research, issues for research ethics committees.David Hunter - unknown
The Case against Ethics Review in the Social Sciences.Zachary M. Schrag - 2011 - Research Ethics 7 (4):120-131.
Research ethics committees: the role of ethics in a regulatory authority.S. McGuinness - 2008 - Journal of Medical Ethics 34 (9):695-700.
A Relational Ethical Dialogue With Research Ethics Committees.Philip J. Larkin, Bernadette Dierckx de Casterlé & Paul Schotsmans - 2008 - Nursing Ethics 15 (2):234-242.
Research ethics committees at work: the experience of one multi-location study.A. E. While - 1996 - Journal of Medical Ethics 22 (6):352-355.
Ethical Review of Action Research: The Challenges for Researchers and Research Ethics Committees.Leslie Gelling & Carol Munn-Giddings - 2011 - Research Ethics 7 (3):100-106.
Practitioner Research, Ethics and Research Governance.Neil Lunt & Christa Fouché - 2010 - Ethics and Social Welfare 4 (3):219-235.
Review of the Regulatory and Governance Environment for Medical Research in the UK with a Particular Focus on Clinical Trials. The Academy of Medical Sciences — Call for Evidence; National Research Ethics Advisors' Panel/Association of Research Ethics Committees Joint Statement May 2010. [REVIEW]David Anderson-Ford & Andrew George - 2010 - Research Ethics 6 (3):108-113.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-01-21

Downloads
3 (#1,714,377)

6 months
1 (#1,475,652)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references