Review of the Regulatory and Governance Environment for Medical Research in the UK with a Particular Focus on Clinical Trials. The Academy of Medical Sciences — Call for Evidence; National Research Ethics Advisors' Panel/Association of Research Ethics Committees Joint Statement May 2010 [Book Review]

&
Research Ethics 6 (3):108-113 (2010)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This joint response from the National Research Ethics Advisors' Panel and the Association of Research Ethics Committees has been formulated on the basis of detailed in depth discussion between the two organizations, in consultation with their membership. NREAP is a body that was constituted by the United Kingdom Ethics Committee Authority in order to provide guidance to, and strategic oversight of the NHS Research Ethics Service. AREC represents all sectors of the Research Ethics Committee community and serves to engage in discussion and debate concerning best practice and to serve the best interests of REC membership.

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1177/174701611000600312

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,423

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Passing the Buck: How the Academy of Medical Sciences's 'New Pathway for the Regulation and Governance of Health Research' Shifts the Regulatory Burden but Fails to Improve the Quality of Research Governance.Christopher Roy-Toole - 2011 - Research Ethics 7 (3):82-90.
Clinical trials: two neglected ethical issues.A. Herxheimer - 1993 - Journal of Medical Ethics 19 (4):211-218.
Polish research ethics committees in the european union system of assessing medical experiments.Marek Czarkowski & Krzysztof Różanowski - 2009 - Science and Engineering Ethics 15 (2):201-212.
Legislative regulation and ethical governance of medical research in different European Union countries.Piret Veerus, Joel Lexchin & Elina Hemminki - 2014 - Journal of Medical Ethics 40 (6):409-413.
The Oxford textbook of clinical research ethics.Ezekiel J. Emanuel (ed.) - 2008 - New York: Oxford University Press.
Conflict or harmony? Clinical research and the medical press in Russia.Dr Boleslav Lichterman - 2002 - Science and Engineering Ethics 8 (3):383-386.
Research ethics committees at work: the experience of one multi-location study.A. E. While - 1996 - Journal of Medical Ethics 22 (6):352-355.
Research ethics committees: the role of ethics in a regulatory authority.S. McGuinness - 2008 - Journal of Medical Ethics 34 (9):695-700.
Selecting subjects for participation in clinical research: one sphere of justice.Charles Weijer - 1999 - Journal of Medical Ethics 25 (1):31-36.
Research on human subjects: Australian ethics committees take tentative steps.L. W. Osborne - 1983 - Journal of Medical Ethics 9 (2):66-68.
Ethical Review of Research on Human Subjects at Unilever: Reflections on Governance.Mark Sheehan, Vernon Marti & Tony Roberts - 2013 - Bioethics 28 (6):284-292.
Conflict or harmony? Clinical research and the medical press in russia.Boleslav Lichterman - 2002 - Science and Engineering Ethics 8 (3):383-386.
The protection of patients' rights in clinical trials.Marek Czarkowski - 2006 - Science and Engineering Ethics 12 (1):131-138.
Placebos and the UK medical research council — and the consumer perspective.Joan Box - 2004 - Science and Engineering Ethics 10 (1):95-101.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-01-21

Downloads
19 (#781,160)

6 months
3 (#1,002,413)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references