Three Levels of Naturalistic Knowledge

In Peter Gärdenfors, Antti Hautamäki, Frank Zenker & Mauri Kaipainen (eds.), Conceptual Spaces: Elaborations and Applications. Springer Verlag (2019)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

A recent naturalistic epistemological account suggests that there are three nested basic forms of knowledge: procedural knowledge-how, conceptual knowledge-what, and propositional knowledge-that. These three knowledge-forms are grounded in cognitive neuroscience and are mapped to procedural, semantic, and episodic long-term memory respectively. This article investigates and integrates the neuroscientifically grounded account with knowledge-accounts from cognitive ethology and cognitive psychology. It is found that procedural and semantic memory, on a neuroscientific level of analysis, matches an ethological reliabilist account. This formation also matches System 1 from dual process theory on a psychological level, whereas the addition of episodic memory, on the neuroscientific level of analysis, can account for System 2 on the psychological level. It is furthermore argued that semantic memory and the cognitive ability of categorization are linked to each other, and that they can be fruitfully modeled within a conceptual spaces framework.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,783

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Was Macht Eine Erkenntnistheorie Naturalistisch?On what makes an epistemology naturalistic.Dirk Koppelberg - 1996 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 27 (1):71-90.
Carving "natural" emotions: "Kindly" from bottom-up but not top-down.Jaak Panksepp - 2008 - Journal of Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology 28 (2):395-422.
Jaina View of Knowledge: Naturalistic or Non-Naturalistic?Kewal Mittal - 1975 - Indian Philosophical Quarterly 2 (3):237-242.
Model for knowledge and legal expert systems.Anja Oskamp - 1992 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 1 (4):245-274.
Ancient Epistemology.Lloyd P. Gerson - 2009 - New York: Cambridge University Press.
Scientific Realism and Naturalistic Epistemology.Richard Boyd - 1980 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1980:613-662.
The possibility of knowledge.Quassim Cassam - 2007 - Grazer Philosophische Studien 74 (1):125-141.
Naturalistic Epistemologies and A Priori Justification.Lisa Warenski - 2010 - In Marcin Milkowski & Konrad Kalmont-Taminski (eds.), Beyond Description. Naturalism and Normativity. College Publications.
The Naturalistic Fallacy.Julia Tanner - 2006 - Richmond Journal of Philosophy 13.

Analytics

Added to PP
2019-06-26

Downloads
11 (#1,133,540)

6 months
7 (#421,763)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Andreas Stephens
Lund University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Thinking, Fast and Slow.Daniel Kahneman - 2011 - New York: New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
What is it like to be a bat?Thomas Nagel - 1974 - Philosophical Review 83 (October):435-50.
The Concept of Mind.Gilbert Ryle - 1949 - Revue Philosophique de la France Et de l'Etranger 141:125-126.

View all 46 references / Add more references