The Adversary System's Argumentative Structure Threatens, Not Protects Dignity

In Mark McBride & J. Penner (eds.), New Essays on the Nature of Legal Reasoning. London, UK: (2022)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,592

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The Adversary System: Who Needs It?Edmund Byrne - 1986 - In M. Davis and F. A. Elliston (ed.), Ethics and the Legal Profession. Buffalo, NY: Prometheus. pp. 204-215.
The Adversary System of Excuse and the Lawyer’s Role.Andrea Romeo - 2018 - Archiv für Rechts- und Sozialphilosophie 104 (4):570-588.
Chimeras and human dignity.Inmaculada de Melo-Martín - 2008 - Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 18 (4):pp. 331-346.
An Adversary Model of Manuscript Review: Further Comments.Robert Bornstein - 1991 - Journal of Mind and Behavior 12 (4):479-486.
Kant on the Ground of Human Dignity.Apaar Kumar - forthcoming - Kantian Review:1-19.
Geteilte Würde.Guido Löhrer - 2004 - Studia Philosophica 63:159-188.
The Relational Structure of Human Dignity.Ariel Zylberman - 2018 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 96 (4):738-752.

Analytics

Added to PP
2022-11-16

Downloads
0

6 months
0

Historical graph of downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references