Pontus in Antiquity: aspects of identity

Dissertation, University of Kent (2022)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The purpose of this thesis is the presentation of the interaction between the successive inhabitants of Pontus in antiquity, indigenous Anatolians, Greeks, Persians and Romans. Limited archaeological evidence cannot determine the precise extent of interaction, although the available information substantiates the notion of a slow, but steady amalgamation. Initially, the intermingling was based on mutual trading links. Although the Hellenic cultural element tended to surface, Eastern factors remained visible. The Mithridatic dynasty was established around the vicinity of Pontus, creating the 'Kingdom of Pontus' which reached its height under Mithridates VI. His administrative and military policy appears to have placed the foundations for the later, Roman corresponding structures. His policies-propaganda reflected the GraecoEastern image of a king, which appealed to the Greek and Persian-Eastern inhabitants of his kingdom, Asia Minor and, to a lesser extent, mainland Greece. This GraecoEastern image might have nourished the concept of a shared history among the inhabitants of Pontus. Their interactions appear to have given rise to an unnamed, local culture, which was enriched with the relevant Roman practices. Around the third century A.D., the Roman administrative patterns might have established an externally defined appellation. During Roman times, Christianity started to be established in Pontus. Although it was not yet a socio-political factor, its non-racial nature prevailed in later centuries. The influence of the Roman-Christian elements can still be observed in the modern Ponti an identity. In antiquity, evidence indicates that no group defined themselves as 'Pontics' or 'Pontians' and an internally defined Pontic identity is unlikely to have existed. However, people associated themselves with the geographical area of Pont us, cultural and religious concepts were frequently amalgamated, while the notion of a common descent and a shared history might have been unconsciously fostered. These factors can assist in the understanding of the 'Pontians' today.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,475

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Notes on Lvcretivs.Cyril Bailey - 1921 - Classical Quarterly 15 (1):18-21.
The Name of the Euxine Pontus Again.A. C. Moorhouse - 1948 - Classical Quarterly 42 (1-2):59-.
Heraclides of Pontus. [REVIEW]J. Mansfeld - 1985 - Mnemosyne 38 (1-2):202-208.
The god Pylon in eastern Pontus.T. B. Mitford - 1966 - Byzantion 36:471-90.
Heraclides of Pontus. [REVIEW]A. A. Long - 1982 - The Classical Review 32 (2):200-202.
Medical Theory in Heraclides of Pontus.I. M. Lonie - 1965 - Mnemosyne 18 (1-4):126-143.
Solitaire Second.Pontus de Tyard & C. Yandell - 1982 - Tijdschrift Voor Filosofie 44 (1):161-161.
Pontus de Tyard, Solitaire Second. [REVIEW]H. De Dijn - 1982 - Tijdschrift Voor Filosofie 44:161.

Analytics

Added to PP
2021-12-15

Downloads
2 (#1,798,685)

6 months
1 (#1,479,630)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

The Great Mother.Erich Neumann & R. Manheim - 1955 - Les Etudes Philosophiques 11 (2):354-356.
Alexander and the Iranians.Albert Brian Bosworth - 1980 - Journal of Hellenic Studies 100:1-21.
Hellenic culture and the Roman heroes of Plutarch.Simon Swain - 1990 - Journal of Hellenic Studies 110:126-145.
Imaginary Greek mountains.Richard Buxton - 1992 - Journal of Hellenic Studies 112:1-15.

View all 11 references / Add more references