The 483 pieces that comprise the work come complete with five indexes. One is a valuable index of correspondents including, for each one, biographical information; there are indexes of names of towns cited in the correspondence, of proper names, of works cited, and of things. The notes systematically establish the ties between different works and point out all the references to works alluded to.

Several editions of Leibniz's works have been published : La Caractéristique géométrique, ed. Javier Echeverria and Marc Parmentier ; La naissance du calcul différentiel: 26 articles des “Acta Eruditorum,” ed. Marc Parmentier, 2. éd.; L’estime des apparences: 21 manuscrits de Leibniz sur les probabilités, la théorie des jeux, l’espérance de vie, ed. Marc Parmentier; and Leibniz, Système de la nature et de la communication des substances et autres textes, ed. Christiane Fremont. Other works include: PROTOGEA, texte latin et traduction Bertrand (...) de Saint Germain, édition traduciton et notes, Jean Marie Barrande ; Le droit de la raison, textes réunis et rassemblés par René Sève ; Yvon Belaval, Leibniz, de l’âge classique aux Lumières: lectures leibniziennes présentation M. Fichant ; and XVIIe siècle, Mersenne, Descartes, Pascal, Spinoza, Leibniz. (shrink)

Arguments for a just transition are integral to debates about climate change and the drive to create a carbon-neutral economy. There are currently two broad approaches rooted in ethics and justice for framing just energy transitions. The first can be described as internal to the transition and emphasizes the anticipation, assessment, and redressing of harms created by the transition itself and the inclusion in transition governance of groups or communities potentially harmed by its disruptions. In this article, we propose a (...) second approach to ethics and justice in an energy transition, which we describe as systemic or societal in scope. This approach complements attention to the proximate dynamics and impacts of the transition process with a focus on the distant societal and economic outcomes the transition brings into being and how they compare to conditions prior to the transition. It poses the question: do the transformative social, economic, and technological changes wrought by energy systems create more just societies and economies, or do they instead reinforce or recreate long-standing injustices and inequalities? We illustrate this approach with an assessment of one of the most significant existing forms of energy injustice: the energy-poverty nexus. We argue that the energy-poverty nexus reflects configurations of socio-energy systems that create complex, extractive feedbacks between energy insecurity and economic insecurity and, over time, reinforce or exacerbate poverty. We further argue that just energy transitions should work to disentangle these configurations and re-design them so as to create generative rather than extractive feedbacks, thus ending the energy-poverty nexus and creating long-term outcomes that are more just, equitable, and fair. (shrink)