Guinea Pig Duties: 1. The Need for Clinical Research

Research Ethics 1 (1):13-22 (2005)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

If patients are to be partners rather than subjects, contributing effectively to clinical research in which they have an interest, both they and investigators must change their ways. The case is argued here that the conduct of clinical research fulfils an essential need of society and that, therefore, in the interests of society, there is a moral imperative that it be done. Further essays will develop this theme, questioning along the way whether consent is a redundant concept.

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1177/174701610500100104

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,709

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Guinea Pig Duties: 4. The Extent and Limits of Patients' Duties in Clinical Research.T. J. Steiner - 2005 - Research Ethics 1 (4):115-121.
Guinea Pig Duties: 3. The Nature of Patients' Duties in Clinical Research.T. J. Steiner - 2005 - Research Ethics 1 (3):84-89.
Guinea Pig Duties: 2. The Origin of Patients' Duties in Clinical Research.T. J. Steiner - 2005 - Research Ethics 1 (2):45-52.
Guinea Pig Duties: 6. Non-Consensual Clinical Research.T. J. Steiner - 2006 - Research Ethics 2 (2):51-58.
Guinea Pig Duties: 5. Coercion and Inducement into Clinical Research.T. J. Steiner - 2006 - Research Ethics 2 (1):3-9.
Guinea Pig Duties: 7. Contingent Rights of Patients in Clinical Research.T. J. Steiner - 2006 - Research Ethics 2 (3):85-91.
Guinea Pig Duties: 8. Another Way.T. J. Steiner - 2006 - Research Ethics 2 (4):132-135.
Ethical challenges in integrating patient-care with clinical research in a resource-limited setting: perspectives from Papua New Guinea. [REVIEW]Moses Laman, William Pomat, Peter Siba & Inoni Betuela - 2013 - BMC Medical Ethics 14 (1):29.
The clinical investigator-subject relationship: a contextual approach.David B. Resnik - 2009 - Philosophy, Ethics, and Humanities in Medicine 4:16-.
Performance enhancement, elite athletes and anti doping governance: comparing human guinea pigs in pharmaceutical research and professional sports.Silvia Camporesi & Michael J. McNamee - 2014 - Philosophy, Ethics, and Humanities in Medicine 9:4.
The Moral Foundation of the Clinical Duties of Care: Needs, Duties and Human Rights.Len Doyal - 2001 - Bioethics 15 (5-6):520-535.
The moral foundation of the clinical duties of care: Needs, duties and human rights.Doyal Len - 2001 - In John Harris (ed.), Bioethics. Oxford University Press. pp. 15--520.
Disputing the ethics of research: The challenge from bioethics and patient activism to the interpretation of the declaration of helsinki in clinical trials.Simon Woods & Pauline Mccormack - 2012 - Bioethics 27 (5):243-250.
Clinical research: up from 'clinical epidemiology'.Olli S. Miettinen, Lucas M. Bachmann & Johann Steurer - 2009 - Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 15 (6):1208-1213.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-01-21

Downloads
22 (#706,230)

6 months
7 (#421,763)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Medical Research on Trial: A Reply to Steiner.Colin Parker - 2005 - Research Ethics 1 (3):101-104.
Editorial.Roger Rawbone - 2005 - Research Ethics 1 (3):75-76.
Reply to Parker.T. J. Steiner - 2005 - Research Ethics 1 (3):105-105.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Utilitarianism: For and Against.J. J. C. Smart & Bernard Williams - 1973 - Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Edited by Bernard Williams.
Just Health Care.Norman Daniels - 1985 - New York: Cambridge University Press.
Just Health Care.Cheyney Ryan - 1990 - Philosophical Review 99 (2):287.
The Ground of Professional Ethics.Daryl Koehn - 1994 - New York: Routledge.

View all 16 references / Add more references