Common Knowledge 25 (1-3):176-191 (2019)

Abstract
The question of universalism versus relativism is often taken to be a matter of critical reflexivity. This article attempts to present the question instead as a matter of practical, political, and always situated concern. The attempt starts from consideration of modern experimental sciences. These sciences usually serve as the stronghold for universalist claims and as such are a target of relativism. It is argued here that the specificity of these sciences is not a method but a concern. To be able to claim that they have not unilaterally imposed their definitions on the phenomena they study is the leading concern of experimenters and should be understood in terms of the following achievement: the creation of a very particular “rapport” that authorizes claiming that what is operationally defined “lends itself” to this correlation. Linking knowledge production with a creation of rapports entails a pluralization of sciences along with the pluralization of modes of concern associated with the rapport. However, resisting unilaterally imposed definitions is not enough because with the coming “knowledge economy,” the questions that this essay raises will soon be part of a romantic past. Thus it concludes with a speculative touch, or perhaps it is a requiem, relating the creation of rapports to an ecology of practices akin to William James’s always-under-construction pluriverse.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1215/0961754x-7299270
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 69,114
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Continuous Variations: The Conceptual and the Empirical in STS.Casper Bruun Jensen - 2014 - Science, Technology, and Human Values 39 (2):192-213.
Experiments In Democracy.Barry Allen - 2012 - Contemporary Pragmatism 9 (2):75-92.

View all 7 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Comparison as a Matter of Concern.Isabelle Stengers - 2011 - Common Knowledge 17 (1):48-63.
Sciences Were Never “Good”.Isabelle Stengers - 2011 - Common Knowledge 17 (1):82-86.
Comparison as Participant.Helen Verran - 2011 - Common Knowledge 17 (1):64-70.
Chaucer and the Nominalist Questions.Russell Peck - 1978 - Speculum 53 (4):745-760.
What Matters About Memory.Christopher Cherry - 1996 - Philosophy 71 (278):541 - 552.
On John Stuart Mill's Project of the Science of Ethology.May Yoh - 1980 - Dissertation, York University (Canada)
Caregiving, Emotion, and Concern for Others.Carolyn Zahn-Waxler - 2001 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 25 (1):48-49.
Legitimacy and Justice in Republican Perspective.Philip Pettit - 2012 - Current Legal Problems 65:59-82.
The Question of Ethics: Nietzsche, Foucault, Heidegger.Roger Paden - 1991 - Review of Metaphysics 44 (4):865-867.
Perception, Generality, and Reasons.Hannah Ginsborg - 2011 - In Andrew Reisner & Asbjørn Steglich-Petersen (eds.), Reasons for Belief. Cambridge University Press. pp. 131--57.
The Meaning of Aristocracy in Aristotle's Political Thought.Liz Anne Alexander - 1997 - Dissertation, University of Toronto (Canada)

Analytics

Added to PP index
2019-09-20

Total views
8 ( #1,002,892 of 2,499,072 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #419,059 of 2,499,072 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes