Review: L. Kalmar, M. Dummett, C. Lejewski, W. V. Quine, F. Sommers, Discussion [Book Review]

Journal of Symbolic Logic 39 (2):361-362 (1974)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,705

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Review: Laszlo Kalmar, Recent Results Concerning the Foundations of Mathematics; Alfred Renyi, Gyorgy Alexits, Janos Aczel, Remarks Concerning the Lecture of Laszlo Kalmar; Laszlo Kalmar, Laszlo Kalmar's Reply. [REVIEW]John G. Kemeny - 1959 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 24 (2):174-174.
On translating logic.Charles Parsons - 1974 - Synthese 27 (3-4):405 - 411.
What’s So Special About Sentences?Philip Hugly & Charles Sayward - 1995 - Communication and Cognition: An Interdisciplinary Quarterly Journal 28 (4):409-25.
Review: A. N. Prior, J. N. Crossley, M. A. E. Dummett, Existence in Lesniewski and in Russell. [REVIEW]C. Lejewski - 1975 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 40 (3):458-458.
Is Quine a Verificationist?Panu Raatikainen - 2003 - Southern Journal of Philosophy 41 (3):399-409.
Review: Fred Sommers, Imre Lakatos, On a Fregean Dogma. [REVIEW]Gerald Standley - 1974 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 39 (2):360-361.
Clues to the paradoxes of knowability: Reply to Dummett and Tennant.Berit Brogaard & Joe Salerno - 2002 - Analysis 62 (2):143–150.
Review: Laszlo Kalmar, Une Forme du Theoreme de Godel Sous des Hypotheses Minimales; Laszlo Kalmar, Quelques Formes Generales du Theoreme de Godel. [REVIEW]Leon Henkin - 1950 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 15 (3):230-230.
Review: William Tuthill Parry, A New Symbolism for the Propositional Calculus; Gerald B. Standley, Ideographic Computation in the Propositional Calculus. [REVIEW]Czesław Lejewski - 1958 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 23 (1):63-63.
Professor Lejewski is opposed to the idea that the ontological commitments of an individual, or of a theory, are to be gauged by the existential assertions made by the former, or by the existential statements provable in the latter. Here, of course.Michael Dummett - 1976 - In J. P. Cleave & Stephan Körner (eds.), Philosophy of Logic: Papers and Discussions. University of California Press. pp. 28.
What Harmony Could and Could Not Be.Florian Steinberger - 2011 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 89 (4):617 - 639.
Michael Dummett on the structure of appearance.Robert Farrell - 1974 - Synthese 28 (2):233 - 249.
Reply to W.V. Quine.Michael Dummett - 1974 - Synthese 27 (3-4):413 - 416.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-11-22

Downloads
9 (#1,272,961)

6 months
1 (#1,501,909)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references