- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
On dealing with bias
Science and Engineering Ethics 8 (4):483-484 (2002)
Abstract
This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)My notes
Similar books and articles
A Remembrance of Raymond E. Spier, 1938–2018.Stephanie J. Bird - 2018 - Science and Engineering Ethics 24 (6):1669-1671.
Introduction.Mark S. Frankel, Rachel Gray, Gary T. Marks & Barbara Simons - 1999 - Science and Engineering Ethics 5 (3):395-402.
Friend or foe: A brief examination of the ethics of corporate sponsored research at universities: A response to ‘ethics and the funding of research and development at universities’ (R. E. Spier).Carl M. Skooglund & Steven P. Nichols - 1998 - Science and Engineering Ethics 4 (3):385-390.
Assessing conflict of interest: Sources of bias.Stephanic J. Bird - 1996 - Science and Engineering Ethics 2 (4):386-388.
Climate Change: Evidence of Human Causes and Arguments for Emissions Reduction.Seth D. Baum, Jacob D. Haqq-Misra & Chris Karmosky - 2012 - Science and Engineering Ethics 18 (2):393-410.
The complexity of competing and conflicting interests.Stephanie J. Bird - 2005 - Science and Engineering Ethics 11 (4):515-517.
Educating Engineering Students to Address Bias and Discrimination Within Their Project Teams.Roland Tormey, Nihat Kotluk & Siara Isaac - 2023 - Science and Engineering Ethics 29 (1):1-21.
E. O. Wilson as moralist. [REVIEW]Stephen J. Pope - 2000 - Science and Engineering Ethics 6 (3):291-297.
Ibo van de Poel and David E. Goldberg (eds): Philosophy and Engineering. An Emerging Agenda. [REVIEW]Ilse Oosterlaken - 2010 - Science and Engineering Ethics 16 (3):629-630.
Commentary on “seeds of discontent: Expert opinion, mass media message, and the public image of agricultural biotechnology” (priest and gillespie).Lisa N. Geller - 2000 - Science and Engineering Ethics 6 (4):541-542.
Analytics
Added to PP
2009-01-28
Downloads
41 (#112,661)
6 months
7 (#1,397,300)
2009-01-28
Downloads
41 (#112,661)
6 months
7 (#1,397,300)
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
Does Studying ‘Ethics’ Improve Engineering Students’ Meta-Moral Cognitive Skills?Reena Cheruvalath - 2019 - Science and Engineering Ethics 25 (2):583-596.
Is Biomedical Research Protected from Predatory Reviewers?Aceil Al-Khatib & Jaime A. Teixeira da Silva - 2019 - Science and Engineering Ethics 25 (1):293-321.
Is Biomedical Research Protected from Predatory Reviewers?Jaime A. Teixeira da Silva & Aceil Al-Khatib - 2019 - Science and Engineering Ethics 25 (1):293-321.
The complexity of competing and conflicting interests.Stephanie J. Bird - 2005 - Science and Engineering Ethics 11 (4):515-517.
A conflict of interest disclosure policy for science and engineering ethics.Stephanie J. Bird & Raymond E. Spier - 2008 - Science and Engineering Ethics 14 (2):149-152.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-68866f4b87-dxklk uwo